|
|
| Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill (1645599) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Dec 20 22:02:48 2025, in response to Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Dec 20 20:44:52 2025. They would be eliminated by attrition which would take 20 years to accomplish.IMO in the B Division the G and L would start being OPTO 24/7 followed by the J since these lines do not interfere with other lines for the most part. Then the C. Good luck to the t/o getting everybody off at 168 & Euclid. After that the M, then the B. And so on till there are no more conductors on the road. Picking a job will suck more and more as time goes on. The train operators better get an increase in that paltry $5.00 per hour OPTO pay. I will feel sorry for the new train operators who have to play conductor too. NYCT will have lots of problems retaining t/o's. I'd like to see Kathy Hochul do all that. OPTO in NYC is a lot different here than in Boston or Philadelphia due to the length of trains (see above) and the heavier ridership. IDK what happens in those cities when there is a BIE, but here when the t/o is on the roadbed, nobody crew member will be on the train with all those people. But this is what they want and the control center will be screaming at the t/o's to hurry up from their ivory tower |
|
|
|