Re: Blog Post: IBX cannot be a tram (1608467) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: Blog Post: IBX cannot be a tram |
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Sun Sep 25 16:35:07 2022, in response to Re: Blog Post: IBX cannot be a tram, posted by Edwards! on Sun Sep 25 15:15:40 2022. When first proposed 3 decades agoas Triboro RX, the idea included running acrossHell Gate for Bronxaccess skipping Manhattan. In the interim before covid, near in suburban employment/reverse commuting grew substantially. In order to use Hell Gate the fleet must be FRA compliant--thus it should be MN-CDOT compatible--more M-8s or the next order.As to capacity, the New York Connecting was originally multi tracked and had passenger service a century ago. Meanwhile, we now have a pussh for New Rochelle to Penn service. One way or another these two should eitherhave a convenient transfer station (think QBP IRT-BMT) or through routing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |