|
|
| Re: IND Second system (1591823) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: IND Second system |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Sun Dec 5 19:16:25 2021, in response to Re: IND Second system, posted by ntrainride on Sun Dec 5 18:58:47 2021. don't confuse your own circumstances for the general population. such options are really not viable for i'd say the majority of jobs. it's a damn rare niche situation.it's hyped like crazy but i still know that probably 95 % of all work has to be done in the workplace. As of two months ago, the latest information available, the federal Department of Labor said that 13% of employed people in the US were WFH at least part of the time. There was no breakdown available between full time WFH'ers and those on hybrid schedules. One more thing the government said was that even at the peak of WFH, in the pre-vaccine spring and summer of 2020, no more than one-third of working people were WFH. Of course there were many people out of work back then. Another point is that some people have always been WFH even long before Covid. It's easy to overestimate the extent of WFH because (1) it gets all sorts of media attention, and (2) it's concentrated in major urban areas rather than spread out around the country. |
|
|
|