|
|
| Re: Anti-car democrats are a road hazard (1578170) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Anti-car democrats are a road hazard |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jun 14 15:46:49 2021, in response to Re: Anti-car democrats are a road hazard, posted by AlM on Mon Jun 14 10:30:55 2021. He can dismount or go into the street. Many times in these areas it is much safer for the cyclist on the sidewalk than in the street which is why I proposed it. Another problem is that sometimes these sidewalks are so poorly maintained they are not usable for pedestrians or cyclists, but that should never be.And what is the big inconvenience for cyclists to dismount? The city believes that believes that pedestrians have the right to cross a major thoroughfare on one traffic signal without having to stop in the median. But if a motorist has to wait for two or three green signals to cross an intersection or make a left turn, no one gives a second thought about that. Why is it that we must never inconvenience a pedestrian or a cyclist, but motorists have no rights and don’t matter? |
|
|
|