|
|
| Re: When BOWERY Was Considered a Terminal (1548732) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: When BOWERY Was Considered a Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Express Rider on Tue May 26 15:44:01 2020, in response to Re: When BOWERY Was Considered a Terminal, posted by randyo on Tue May 26 15:07:33 2020. re:- If a fuse blows, however, the blown fuse will have to be removed - If a circuit breaker trips, the crew member in the cab where it is located can reset it immediately and barring a second failure proceed down the road. So, it's the same principle then as with fuses & circuit breakers in someone's house. I thought that maybe the electrical system's entire design would be different enough in an earlier car that had fuses, as opposed to one built later with circuit breakers so that they could not operate together. - Thanks for clarifying. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|