|
|
| Re: Should the city take back its buses and subways? (1507737) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Should the city take back its buses and subways? |
|
|
Posted by Stephen Bauman on Thu Mar 21 12:29:48 2019, in response to Re: Should the city take back its buses and subways?, posted by randyo on Wed Mar 20 18:53:15 2019. in the past, keying by worked.That depends on one's definition of "worked". In this context, I'm assuming "keying-by" was necessary to maintain the past's shorter headways. By necessary, I mean that without "keying-by" those shorter headways could not be maintained. I think this is a valid interpretation for "worked" in this context. If there were instances where the past headways were maintained while not employing keying-by, then your "worked" statement is incorrect within the constraints of the this definition. I can attest, to the best of my ability, that I have witnessed 100 second headways on the Flushing Line without the T/O resorting to keying-by. The documented 86 second headways on the Third Avenue El were before my time. |
|
|
|