|
|
| Re: [PHOTO] Re: The IND's 1st 13 Months (1932-1933) [A Timeline] (1474630) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [PHOTO] Re: The IND's 1st 13 Months (1932-1933) [A Timeline] |
|
|
Posted by MainR3664 on Thu May 3 07:18:20 2018, in response to [PHOTO] Re: The IND's 1st 13 Months (1932-1933) [A Timeline], posted by Bill Newkirk on Wed May 2 07:26:06 2018. The super-clean state of the station and lack of even a single passenger tells me that this was a publicity shot and/or a test train just before the line opened.Also, I'd never want to argue with anyone who remembers, or has spoken to anyone who remembered, what things were like back then- but everything I've read tells me that the first Queens Boulevard service was provided by the E. Maybe they wanted to designate it as such, even though it was a local, to make it the primary letter for the line- sort of like how the 8th Ave Line is the A- even though the D runs on it a lot (as did the original C, back then)? |
|
|
|