|
|
| Re: Tuscarora Almanac for January 1 (1461123) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Tuscarora Almanac for January 1 |
|
|
Posted by Q4 on Thu Jan 4 08:31:04 2018, in response to Re: Tuscarora Almanac for January 1, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Wed Jan 3 20:59:55 2018. Even with side platforms, the tunnel segment around 116th would have to be enlarged.Back in the late 90's, when this reiteration of the SAS project was being planned, I recall seeing in planning and environmental documents that were made available an alternative that did have a scheme to not use part of the existing segment. This alternative had the tunnel diverting after the 106th St. Station, cutting diagonally under private property until making it to the 125th St. Station. This totally bypassed much, if not all of the 110th St. to 119th St. segment and left no possibility for a 116th St. Station. This alternative was rejected early on. It is possible this is what was being referred to. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|