|
|
| Re: Interesting Read: Original Destination and Route Designation for BMT Standards (1452144) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Interesting Read: Original Destination and Route Designation for BMT Standards |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Mon Oct 16 00:26:16 2017, in response to Re: Interesting Read: Original Destination and Route Designation for BMT Standards, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sun Oct 15 20:09:27 2017. You bring up interesting points, but nevertheless, both gantlet track and gap fillers were considered in an attempt to work out joint operation on both lines. The 3rd rail issue probably would have made the gap filler solution the more practical one since as is currently the case both IRT and BMT/IND cars can use the same 3rd rails and IRT cars do use the BMT/IND 3rd rail to get to/from the BMT and IND yards where they are maintained. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|