|
|
| Re: Port Jervis Improvement Study (1431417) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Port Jervis Improvement Study |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sun Mar 26 20:15:32 2017, in response to Re: Port Jervis Improvement Study, posted by 3-9 on Sun Mar 26 16:49:34 2017. Operationally yes, and that is how most of the world does single track with passing sidings - they pass at a station.That said, they would have to build two platforms, and all the ADA fun that encompasses. Someone somewhere might even insist on an overpass (ADA compatible, of course) because passengers can't be trusted to be responsible with at-grade crossings. You then end up with a monstrosity like this:  The 3 story building-like structures on each side are solely to house ramps and stairs. Nothing useful like ticket machines, vending machines, or an official restroom. An added kicker is the inbound platform is the one that requires crossing all that nonsense. |
|
|
|