|
|
| Re: Brighton Line (1425168) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Brighton Line |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Tue Jan 24 15:32:27 2017, in response to Re: Brighton Line, posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Tue Jan 24 14:57:52 2017. To have the Q as the full-time Brighton Local made sense in 2004 because the:1) Brighton Express and 2) CPW Local from 6th Ave. . . were both part-time operations so it made sense for those two to be the same service, hence, the B. The convenience of having one part-time line cover these part-time operations outweighed the concerns of Brighton riders not having easy access to 6th Ave off-hours (anyway, from 7/2001 to 5/2004, such access did not exist at all). does weekend Brighton ridership warrant two services? It may have had a chance without the SAS, in that the argument was building that 6 TPH was not enough for the Brighton line weekends. But now it has more than 6 TPH, so the case for adding an express just got weaker. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|