|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1423420) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Jan 8 18:15:51 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Sun Jan 8 16:58:49 2017. It could easily delay somebody an hour if they intend to go to Astoria and end up at 96/6Only if that someone is really paralyzed. It's 10 minutes from 57/7 to 96/2. But yes, ending up at 96/2 instead of Astoria is worse than ending up at 57/7 instead of 49th. My point was that not many people got confused about 57/7 vs 49, and not many people would get confused about 96/2 vs. Astoria. I am saying this is an unimportant issue. But I do agree that there is lesser confusion for this unimportant issue if the 96/2-bound trains are labeled as Qs. My opinion is that the best solution for this unimportant issue would be to start them off as 96/2-bound Ns, and then suddenly on the Manhattan Bridge they get re-signed as Qs with an announcement to that effect. |
|
|
|