Re: N to 96/2 (1423259) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Jan 7 19:59:43 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Sat Jan 7 19:53:28 2017. I agree that signing northbound Sea Beach trains headed for 96/2 as Qs will result in slightly fewer wrong moves than signing them as Ns.But I think after the first few weeks it'll be really minor either way. |