|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1423136) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Andrew Saucci on Sat Jan 7 11:23:20 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 7 09:53:04 2017. I'm not even thinking of looking at a PDF version of a printed timetable on a smartphone; I'm thinking of someone using a smartphone app that is derived from an official timetable. All it will say is "Get on the N to 96 St." If the train then pulls in signed as a Q, that's ridiculous, regardless of whether it's running with a Q crew, an N crew, or a Z crew, or whether we're out of letters, or what. One shouldn't have to be a foamer to ride the subway system as an ordinary passenger. It shouldn't have to be that hard to provide accurate, clear information to riders who do not have an encyclopedic knowledge of the subway system. And the E to 179 thing is dumb too, while we're at it. I know about that but if I'm in a hurry and other things are on my mind, I might well forget and just jump on the 179 train instead of the Jamaica Center train. After all, it said E on the front. No one cares about the TA's internal problem of not being able to send all E's to Jamaica Center.It all makes as much sense as me saying that my name is Charlie on alternate Tuesdays. |
|
|
|