Re: N to 96/2 (1423017) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by GojiMet86 on Fri Jan 6 15:09:46 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by New Flyer #857 on Fri Jan 6 13:25:20 2017. Why confuse people like that? That's even more unnecessary. What happens to the people who thought they were on a (N) going to Ditmars? A (Q) via Sea Beach isn't as confusing.All of these reasons to have a (N) 96th Street provide more inconvenience to Manhattan and Astoria riders than a (Q) via Sea Beach. And those Brooklyn riders aren't as inconvenienced by a (Q) popping up. Honestly, this obsessive effort is derived from the train buff compulsion of seeing a train signed up as a (N) train to 96th Street. Like how Wallyhorse insists on a brown (R) to Nassau or wherever the hell he wants to send it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |