|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1422780) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Thu Jan 5 01:40:15 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 4 22:53:37 2017. Therefore perhaps JoeV should write a snail letter to NYCT asking why the inconsistency between the Q via Sea Beach and the E to 179?Note to all who have questioned and second guessed me in this thread: I am just reporting what is going on with the N's to 96. I am not a transit spokesperson to justify anything. I stick up for the signage because the only way I survived down there was keeping my mouth shut and following orders. Therefore I should not be taking any grief!!!!! |
|
|
|