|
|
| Re: November 6, 2016 B Division Pick N short-turns to 96th, W part of N (1406128) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: November 6, 2016 B Division Pick N short-turns to 96th, W part of N |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Tue Aug 23 17:49:24 2016, in response to Re: November 6, 2016 B Division Pick N short-turns to 96th, W part of N, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Aug 23 16:46:57 2016. First, because at SF Muni some years back we had people claiming and being paid over 80 hours a week. Second, because, if you think a forty hour workweek is enough time to spend away from family, sleep, encouraging many workers to do 48 or more reduces the totality of full time jobs available. We have a "surplus" of potential workers already, encouraging more OT only exacerbates the issue.As to volunteering, in my life, since I basically set my own hours, yes I put in as many or few as it takes to meet my goals for the day/project. Third, I agree w/ the rules of both FRA and CA PUC as to a daily limit on hours of service and mandatory minimum rest between shifts. I want the workers to be safe--not nodding off because of sleep deficits. When I am overly tired, I don't think straight; thus I am a less proficient worker. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|