Re: Silverliner V problems (1401807) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: Silverliner V problems |
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Wed Jul 13 00:47:54 2016, in response to Re: Silverliner V problems, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 12 23:22:47 2016. Thinking about it, in this case there shouldn't be - it would set a bad precedent.Hear me out: by allowing non-NJT to work on it, it opens the door to contracting the work out. As we all know, the "lowest bidder" requirement means the government is (by design) *terrible* at selecting contractors. Keeping things in house ultimately saves money. Also they can be sure that the maintenance records are kept consistent. |
(There are no responses to this message.)