|
|
| Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit (1393774) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
|
Posted by pragmatist on Wed Apr 27 15:36:16 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 27 11:23:05 2016. It is worth reading further information about the case. Quite a bit of the information people believe results from inaccurate reporting (surprising, right) and the fact that these things take on a life of their own. Judgement was reduced drastically by the judge, and settled out of court before appeals. There were warnings on the cup, jury didn't think they were big enough.(I always figured this case was why they were there) Woman was held 20% responsible for her own injuries, but 80% of a big number is still a big number. I always thought it was California, (a state that seems to attract this kind of stuff)and it was actually New Mexico. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|