Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit (1393691)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 26 21:48:15 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by pragmatist on Tue Apr 26 21:40:15 2016. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Yep ... they were hell bent on keeping things mechanical. Not that I had a problem with that, but my background was electronic designs and they seemed less interested in moving forward at the time, so I moved on. The early Northern Telecom stuff looked cheapass, but it was very well built despite its looks. And no, "life critical" stuff allows no slack. :)

Responses

• Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Tue Apr 26 23:20:27 2016
  • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - SelkirkTMO - Tue Apr 26 23:53:05 2016
    • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Wed Apr 27 08:43:43 2016
  • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - SelkirkTMO - Tue Apr 26 23:53:46 2016
    • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - Jackson Park B Train - Wed Apr 27 00:24:18 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - SelkirkTMO - Wed Apr 27 00:41:14 2016
    • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Wed Apr 27 08:48:42 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - SelkirkTMO - Wed Apr 27 17:07:48 2016
    • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - Stephen Bauman - Wed Apr 27 09:42:55 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Wed Apr 27 10:24:03 2016

Post a New Response