Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit (1393539)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit

Posted by pragmatist on Mon Apr 25 19:45:10 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by nasadowsk on Mon Apr 25 19:20:38 2016. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Well, there were some lower and higher frequency combinations used (based on multiples of 16 2/3)used in multiple subscriber party line ringing, but I never worked on that. Also some PBX systems had 30 hz ringing, but that is still pretty slow.

Responses

• Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - nasadowsk - Mon Apr 25 20:29:57 2016
  • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Mon Apr 25 20:44:58 2016
    • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - Dyre Dan - Tue Apr 26 06:15:31 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - pragmatist - Tue Apr 26 07:41:38 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - Jersey Mike - Tue Apr 26 23:36:05 2016
      • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - Stephen Bauman - Tue Apr 26 23:57:15 2016
        • Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit - SelkirkTMO - Wed Apr 27 00:07:40 2016

Post a New Response