|
|
| Re: One proposed alternative service for L riders (1385650) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: One proposed alternative service for L riders |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Feb 15 17:25:37 2016, in response to Re: One proposed alternative service for L riders, posted by Michael549 on Mon Feb 15 15:01:56 2016. Having several options in place (in the event of a closure) even if each option is "minimal" by some standard that can actually help the immediate riders of the L-train - is best.Agreed, but some are more minimal than others. Increasing WB service from the current 20 tph to as many as 30 tph (with as many trains as possible going up 6th and the rest going to Chambers or Broad) is by far the biggest single improvement that can be made, overwhelms any of the others, and singlehandedly makes a huge impact on the problem. |
|
|
|