Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: What If The Dodgers had not moved from Brooklyn?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 12 15:03:42 2015, in response to Re: What If The Dodgers had not moved from Brooklyn?, posted by MATHA531 on Sun Oct 11 10:27:30 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Flushing actually made the most sense as a home for the Dodgers. I wonder if O’Malley didn’t really give a shit and just proposed the Dodger Dome in Downtown Brooklyn as a negotiating chip that would provide an excuse to move to New Jersey or California.

Had the Dodgers moved to Flushing, they probably would have moved back to Brooklyn with the popularity of retro ballparks in downtown areas, i.e. CitiField would be at Atlantic Yards instead of Barclays Center. As for the inaccuracy of the name “Brooklyn Dodgers” while playing outside of Brooklyn, no one would care, just like the Giants, Jets and other teams that play outside their parent cities. Or they could have become the New York Dodgers. They would have reverted their names at some point anyway, especially now that Brooklyn is so trendy.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]