|
|
| Re: Railroad Agency to Detail New Rail-Track Standards (1369356) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Railroad Agency to Detail New Rail-Track Standards |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Fri Oct 9 15:07:50 2015, in response to Re: Railroad Agency to Detail New Rail-Track Standards, posted by orange blossom special on Fri Oct 9 14:54:49 2015. cronyism/nepotism date back at least to Roman Republican times, and I would expect the same in Chinese Imperial history. not defending the practice, just pointing out that humans tend to think of people they know and trust first when looking to fill a need.in the instant case, I prefer to see the crude not pumped, but if pumped, hauled by rail. As to the tar sands crude (which we don't need), the net energy is miniscule after tallying up the cost of production. ROI insufficient to justify the costs. One would do better in a low interest savings account. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|