Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1339897) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
Posted by R30A on Sat Feb 14 21:11:58 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by Dutchrailnut on Sat Feb 14 20:58:24 2015. The answer is that you don't run diesel trains with higher reliability than EMUs!MDBF P32s 24K M3As 211K M7As 421K M8s 226K Furthermore, Dual mode engines are a single point of failure. A dead M7 can still be moved by the other cars in its train, although a failure is relatively unlikely, as it breaks down less than 1/10th as often! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |