|
|
| Re: Case Against LGA Link (1335256) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Case Against LGA Link |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 23 16:28:20 2015, in response to Re: Case Against LGA Link, posted by Stephen Bauman on Fri Jan 23 13:40:33 2015. That comes to 71.9 passengers per plane.But that could hypothetically include 50% of planes having 50 seats and 50% of planes having 150 seats, averaging 71.9% occupied. Now if you replace all 50 seat planes with 90 seat planes, you've raised capacity by 20% even without raising the occupancy rate. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|