|
|
| Re: Case Against LGA Link (1334762) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Case Against LGA Link |
|
|
Posted by Stephen Bauman on Tue Jan 20 23:04:24 2015, in response to Re: Case Against LGA Link, posted by pragmatist on Tue Jan 20 22:56:49 2015. Airport workers would benefit from better transit. I have nothing but anecdotal evidence, but any time I've been on the JFK Airtrain, there seem to be quite a few of them.There are many more workers at JFK than at LGA. JFK has freight operations; LGA does not. JFK has customs and immigration for international flights; LGA does not. Capital projects that improve quality of life my be very worthwhile even if they are not self supporting... The question is priority. There are many capital projects that can be justified financially that would not get built because the money to build them would be wasted on projects like LGA extension, South Ferry, etc. These unbuilt capital projects would also improve the quality of life. |
|
|
|