|
|
| Re: ''House GOP bill would force Amtrak to rethink its insane boarding process'' (1314851) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: ''House GOP bill would force Amtrak to rethink its insane boarding process'' |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Sep 23 14:37:45 2014, in response to Re: ''House GOP bill would force Amtrak to rethink its insane boarding process'', posted by AlM on Tue Sep 23 13:48:20 2014. No I didn't. I said LIRR Concourse level.I know. But LIRR Concourse it a proper noun. Adding "level" made it ambiguous, especially since I already called it the "lower level". The "rule" is the signs at the Exit Councourse (which is on the same level as the LIRR Councourse) that say "No Trespassing. No unauthorized personnel permitted."There's a "no trespassing" sign halfway up Stair X at NYP. I think such signs at NYP may be trivial. You can argue that if you have a ticket you are authorized. However, these are hostile signs because you can't be 100% sure your argument will be accepted.I would argue that based upon how much effort Amtrak expends up in the Amtrak Concourse, the fact that many people board from the lower level must be known to Amtrak and they must purposely allow it to continue. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|