| Re: We Have Another One (131255) | |||
|
|
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
Re: We Have Another One |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Aug 26 14:45:45 2005, in response to Re: We Have Another One, posted by Alex L. on Fri Aug 26 14:27:46 2005. So, no beating of a woman exposing herself, as you said you would do if it was a man? (And to head off the imminent arrival of the moron(s), I'm using "beating" in the sense of 1. To strike repeatedly. 2. To subject to repeated beatings or physical abuse; batter. 3. To punish by hitting or whipping; flog.)Actually, as I stated in another post, the "beating" part is something I would like to do. However the law, of course, does not allow my wish so I simply call or find police. It does not matter man or woman, I will do the same procedure on both incidents the same day. Of course someone else took it off the deep end about my "beatings", but let's you and I not go there to that level. An exhibitionist would not be treated as a sex offender under Megan's Law until she (he) is convicted, serves time and is released. Right and with some evidence like a photgraph, the perp will be convicted or plead guilty to the offense for a lesser charge. Since sex crimes are a serious matter in NY State under Megan's Law, it is doubtful any one of the 5 NYC District Attorneys will offer a plea deal. Actually, I assumed that a conviction will automatically place you under the Sex Offenders Registry, not upon release from incarceration. In the incident I cited, it was 1030 at Pacific St - plenty of people around, very hard to pull that off. Right, one suspect against two dozen or so witnesses will not be able to pass off any bogus stories of rape/sexual assault. But there are instances where a man is alone with a woman in an R68 subway car and the man might take the wrong direction of accepting a sexual advance from the woman and she cries assault even before the man was going to do (sic!) something. |