|
|
| Re: M-9 contract to Kawasaki (1247435) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: M-9 contract to Kawasaki |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Sep 14 00:35:04 2013, in response to Re: M-9 contract to Kawasaki, posted by Gold_12th on Sat Sep 14 00:30:27 2013. When it comes down to bids, it's all about MEETING the specs ... bid specs must be non-discriminatory, but they can be well-written to ensure that unqualified bidders cannot meet those specifications. All comes down to the quality of those "detailed specifications" and ensuring that any vendor that meets them provides exactly what is needed. If a "bad vendor" slips through the cracks somehow, then those specs weren't well-written.Simple as that. If Rotem met properly written specs, then the cars would not be a fail. :) |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|