|
|
| Re: Essex- Before the IND (1244628) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Essex- Before the IND |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 28 01:10:13 2013, in response to Re: Essex- Before the IND, posted by randyo on Tue Aug 27 03:52:35 2013. Ehh, that explanation sounds a little flaky. Since the situation was supposed to be "temporary", it would have made sense to have the move for the time being and divert the construction resources to the permanent structures. Otherwise, this would only make sense if the Manhattan Bridge diversion was meant to permanent, or at least VERY long term. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|