|
|
| Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167955) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Sun Jul 22 23:58:11 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by merrick1 on Sun Jul 22 18:33:51 2012. Or if rationality ruled, Montgomery, PG, Arlington, Fairfax would, like the Bronx, Queens, Kings, and Richmond, be the outer boros. 179th/Hillside to say95th St or 207th to Far Rockaway are far longer than any equivalent single fare on WMATA. The city/ounty borders are really obsolete. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|