|
|
| Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article (1164238) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article |
|
|
Posted by Michael549 on Sun Jul 1 07:45:08 2012, in response to Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article, posted by Dyre Dan on Sun Jul 1 07:04:01 2012. There is also another issue - the "ease of ducking under the turnstyle". Little kids can easily and EFFORTLESSLY duck under the turnstyle, while bigger kids have to get down on their knees and crawl under in an obvious movement that requires effort - usually at that point, I say it is time that the kids (or their parents) start paying.Mike |
|
|
|