Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article (1164211)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jul 1 00:09:05 2012, in response to 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article, posted by Gold_12TH on Sat Jun 30 23:55:34 2012. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d So MTA's not normal, eh. Lots of agencies have the rule about over a certain age and under a certain height where they charge a half-fare for children, and over the height is full fare.

Responses

• Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Dyre Dan - Sun Jul 1 07:04:01 2012
  • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Michael549 - Sun Jul 1 07:45:08 2012
    • Re: 44 inches in height rule – WSJ article - Olog-hai - Mon Jul 2 01:08:51 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule – WSJ article - WillD - Mon Jul 2 02:14:44 2012
  • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - R36 #9346 - Sun Jul 1 19:26:11 2012
    • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - randyo - Sun Jul 1 20:56:18 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - SelkirkTMO - Sun Jul 1 21:00:44 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Broadway Lion - Sun Jul 1 21:07:57 2012
        • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Olog-hai - Mon Jul 2 01:04:01 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Lou from Brooklyn - Mon Jul 2 08:18:47 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - R36 #9346 - Tue Jul 3 00:53:18 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Spider-Pig - Tue Jul 3 16:19:44 2012
    • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Handbrake - Sun Jul 1 22:55:16 2012
      • Re: 44 inches in height rule - WSJ article - Train Dude - Sun Jul 1 23:20:16 2012

Post a New Response