|
|
| Re: Water Damage Soils City's Newest Subway Station - South Ferry (1) (1163668) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Water Damage Soils City's Newest Subway Station - South Ferry (1) |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Jun 27 09:13:10 2012, in response to Re: Water Damage Soils City's Newest Subway Station - South Ferry (1), posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 26 21:48:11 2012. Looks like Schiavone wins this one then ... if the "detailed specifications" did not specify waterproofing, then Schiavone was not obligated in any way to do anything other than pour cement down there.That's generally how contracts work. If there's no item in the contract for waterproofing, the contractor isn't going to provide waterproofing. In this case, though, the article says "funding was secured from the contractor to address the leaks," so Schiavone did end up on the hook. |
|
|
|