|
|
| Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding (1162081) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding |
|
|
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Sat Jun 16 08:27:25 2012, in response to Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding, posted by Joe V on Sat Jun 16 06:36:13 2012. a way wet dream Alt-G is physicaly impossible for two reasons.reason 1 Water tunnel no 1 would need to be passed at over 220 feet down as tunneling is not allowed within 100 feet of water bore. reason 2 as Alt-G is based on through service all 3 MNCR lines would need to be electrified with Catenary or NJT would need to go third rail. as there is no clearance for catenary in park avenue tunnels or bronx, I would assume you want NJT to change. |
|
|
|