|
|
| Re: Best Article I've Read on Reasons to Reactivate the Rockaway Beach Line (1155247) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Best Article I've Read on Reasons to Reactivate the Rockaway Beach Line |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Tue May 8 06:21:43 2012, in response to Re: Best Article I've Read on Reasons to Reactivate the Rockaway Beach Line, posted by Dyre Dan on Mon May 7 18:49:24 2012. I would agree except for one problem:I would think if Genting is paid for it, they would want a line that also serves lower Manhattan on the branch. Remember, Genting (the parent company of Resorts World, which runs the casino at Aqueduct) is based in Malaysia, and they may want a line like the (W) I proposed because lower Manhattan is still to many the financial district (even if it is a shell of what it once was in that regard). As the (M) no longer serves there, it may not be acceptable to Genting. That was why I have the (W) from Whitehall Street-Rockaway Park as a 24/7 line and all of the other changes noted. |
|
|
|