|
|
| Re: G Train: Present and Future (Opinion Piece) (1149885) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: G Train: Present and Future (Opinion Piece) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Mon Apr 9 18:45:27 2012, in response to Re: G Train: Present and Future (Opinion Piece), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 9 14:53:21 2012. And this is exactly what I am getting at, and what you refuse to accept because you stubbornly cling to the idea that you are correct. You can't just reinforce what's there. You would need to significantly reconfigure the structure.While the terminology may have been wrong, It's funny. This is a board where someone might be raked over the coals if he didn't notice the difference between an R42, or an R40M, or even the difference between an R42 overhauled at CIYD, and one overhauled outside, but a description of two totally different types of structural members is me being a nit-pick. If a used the term axles to mean trucks, would that be "basically the same thing"? Should everyone have known what I meant? |
|
|
|