|
|
| Re: I'd like proff. (100293) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: I'd like proff. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sat Jun 18 09:07:50 2005, in response to I'd like proff., posted by H.S.Relay on Sat Jun 18 07:50:45 2005. There is mno irony here. I merely pointed out that Jeff doesn't know what he;s talking about regarding CBTC. He'd deny it even knowing that it's already in use. That's still true."Signaling is NOT a distinct craft with a distinct design approach from ATM machines, web browsers and/or industrial controls" Do you read Nuclear News? Go to the American Nuclear Society's website and look trhrough some of their literature. Nuclear News is a good place to start. Signaling is an application with a mathematical and empirical base. CBTC can serve it just as electro-mechanical relay design serves it. Both are elegant theoetical designs; CBTC offers advantages and capabilities that the 1920s relay system cannot. |
|
|
|