Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 5

 

(1918328)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 14 22:36:22 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 22:29:42 2022.

I don’t know what the proposal is, but explaining how to do a crime isn’t protected speech.

Post a New Response

(1918329)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Dec 14 23:06:45 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 22:29:42 2022.

It's all wrong, no matter who does it.

Post a New Response

(1918330)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 23:08:03 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 14 22:36:22 2022.

What if it's only a crime in Texas?

Can Texas block access to all internet sites that mention the best ways to get and smoke marijuana, just because marijuana is illegal in Texas?

Why aren't people prosecuted for making information available about making bombs?



Post a New Response

(1918331)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by Easy on Wed Dec 14 23:24:27 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 23:08:03 2022.

Is it illegal to make a bomb?

Post a New Response

(1918332)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 23:31:21 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by Easy on Wed Dec 14 23:24:27 2022.

I think so. But it seems to be legal to publish a book about how to make a bomb.



Post a New Response

(1918337)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by Easy on Thu Dec 15 01:56:33 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 23:31:21 2022.

Yeah and the crypto guy could probably write a book about how to defraud people. Maybe it's the action, not the speech.

Post a New Response

(1918344)

view threaded

Re: Guess who’s back, back again

Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 15 03:17:00 2022, in response to Re: Guess who’s back, back again, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 14 22:29:42 2022.

They do. Not only that, they seek to add contraception to the ban.

I don't think it’s actually illegal to make a bomb, but you better be licensed to use one. Thus, knowledge of same would be legal as well, at least theoretically.


Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 5

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]