|
|
| Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court (952661) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
|
| (954802) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Mon Jul 2 18:35:30 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 14:50:26 2012. Oh sorry, not all of us are 1%ers who can stay up to the minute on subchat 24/7 nor are we here faking workers compensation. My apologies for living a disapproving lifestyle on here! |
|
|
| (954806) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 19:02:25 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by orange blossom special on Mon Jul 2 18:28:58 2012. well la-de-da Mr Harry Reid.? I suppose anyone who ain't a 1%er and doesn't need the extra scholarship money by getting a point or two more doesn't exist and become an assumption. Now you're an OWSer? LOL! I didn't take the test again not because I thought it was wrong but because I didn't have to. |
|
|
| (955196) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 3 18:04:40 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by orange blossom special on Mon Jul 2 18:35:30 2012. Yikes! Well I need a distraction. . .Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. Conway Twitty: |
|
|
| (955222) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:31:22 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 3 18:04:40 2012. YIKES! To a total shithed. GO FIGURE |
|
|
| (955224) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:33:13 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by orange blossom special on Mon Jul 2 08:52:13 2012. No cloue. You are not oe to talk. |
|
|
| (955225) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:33:37 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:32:08 2012. lool |
|
|
| (955227) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:35:22 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:35:46 2012. Please do not encourage her/him/it. |
|
|
| (955229) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:36:37 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 19:02:25 2012. OWS l9l |
|
|
| (955435) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Wed Jul 4 09:26:33 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Jul 3 18:31:22 2012. My point exactly. Are the detectives outside your box right now? |
|
|
| (955437) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Wed Jul 4 09:28:42 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 19:02:25 2012. Yep, 180 or you don't need the $.Normally it would be okey if you took it to satisfy a parent or whatnot, but considering this is subchat, subwaysurf would never allow anyone not to be an asshole, so I have to stick with the former(a word he don't know). |
|
|
| (955496) | |
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 4 12:33:04 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by orange blossom special on Wed Jul 4 09:28:42 2012. I cared more about time than money. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||