|
|
| Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again (956434) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (956890) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 18:48:48 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 09:34:23 2012. Did you just threaten me, bitch? You make nothing. You produce nothing. You are just a hanger on sucking someone else's skills |
|
|
| (956895) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:05:20 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jul 7 18:09:38 2012. Actually, that's just left wing media bullshit. The source of that rumor declined to offer any proof to substantiate the claim, much as I suspect that you will - except for the original media story perhaps. |
|
|
| (956899) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jul 8 19:17:39 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 18:47:08 2012. the bingbong didn't vote or actually voted for McCain . . . ? That last response confused me. |
|
|
| (956902) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:20:11 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:05:20 2012. Apparently Bain never got your memo. :)http://www.bain.com/about/social-impact/index.aspx That's OK ... just go with what Goebbels (Rove and Ailes) tell you and don't worry about what's going on outside your basement ... |
|
|
| (956903) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:22:20 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jul 8 19:17:39 2012. Nope ... he's THAT kinky (as though his other posts weren't already a clue) ... |
|
|
| (956904) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:22:20 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jul 8 19:17:39 2012. She lies about her lies. She donated to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Maybe she did a write in for Al Sharpton. |
|
|
| (956905) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:24:05 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:20:11 2012. Just as I suspected. Where does it say that US jobs went to China? Spin, dervish, spin. |
|
|
| (956907) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:28:36 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:24:05 2012. Sorry to say, you're not worth the effort of looking up any further details because your response would be the same anyway. Others who will come through this thread and read Bain's stuff will say "Hmmm" about those "87 Shanghai's" ... you? C'mon man ... you don't want to hear it, your "mind" is made up. |
|
|
| (956909) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:32:16 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:28:36 2012. You are correct. I'm not worth it but you just proved my point to those who are worth it unless you are saying that no one on Subchat is worth your time. |
|
|
| (956910) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jul 8 19:33:03 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:24:05 2012. The Obama Element does not care that it's a lie about Romney sending jobs abroad. The Element is emotion and nothing else.What's scary about Obama is that unemployment is at over 8% and there's no way his second term will be better than his first so it's something we're going to deal with for generations to come. |
|
|
| (956913) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:44:23 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jul 8 19:33:03 2012. That is a fact. Unfortunately Romney is in the position where he has to either defend himself from the dishonesty of the obamites or put out his own message. Unemployment of over 8.2% doesn't bother O'bummer. He wants and entitlement state where half of the population are forced to support the other half.The number of persons on permanent disability has climbed from over 2 million to over 8 million in the last few years. Considering that the workplaces are continually being made safer, what do you think has changed? Last month, more people went on disability than new jobs were created. Sickening that so many people refuse to see what's happening or will lie about it to support their own political agenda. |
|
|
| (956916) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 19:50:23 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:32:16 2012. The worthy will ask politely ... :) |
|
|
| (956954) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 20:54:51 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 19:22:20 2012. Who I voted for is none of your business. I volunteered that it wasn't for President Obama. That's all anyone needs to know.I did contribute to Hillary's 2008 primary campaign. So what? Your opinion of that means nothing. Nor do you have any right to stop me. |
|
|
| (956956) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 20:57:34 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 20:54:51 2012. He's constantly showing off his personality here ... jibes with all I've heard from people who worked for/with him. :( |
|
|
| (956958) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:06:42 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 18:48:48 2012. How are stating some facts threatening anyone? Getting a tad paranoid? Dipping into those non-prescribed drugs?You also have no idea of what I do, what it involves or what it produces. Stop lying about my jobs. You're retired, you produce nothing. You were a middle management paper pusher at the MTA. Tell me one thing that creates besides expense for the customer and taxpayers. |
|
|
| (956962) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:09:50 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 20:54:51 2012. The fact that you contributed to Hillary's campaign is not an opinion, ass-wipe. |
|
|
| (956967) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:14:09 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:06:42 2012. Worried about my private life again? You must live a very shallow existence. |
|
|
| (956974) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:20:03 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:09:50 2012. I don't consider your discussing it anything but opinion. It had nothing to do with you. It is not a weapon for you to use, yet you seem to think it is. |
|
|
| (956977) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:22:52 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:14:09 2012. Your former work, as a civil servant, is not the least bit private. That is everybody's concern. Did we get our value out of you? |
|
|
| (956982) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:32:38 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:20:03 2012. How is it a weapon? It's a fact. Unless, of course, you are somehow embarrassed by it. |
|
|
| (956985) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:34:53 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:22:52 2012. My bosses felt that they did and that's all that counts. Now since the public is paying for your medical care, I guess we get to make the same judgements about you. |
|
|
| (956987) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:36:46 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:32:38 2012. Why do you keep bringing it up? You are the last person on earth I have to answer to.You bring it up like you think you're exposing evidence of witchcraft. Which is it NOT. You are the last person on earth I have to answer to. In fact, as a former civil servant you have more to answer to ME, a taxpayer. |
|
|
| (956989) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:37:41 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:36:46 2012. Why does it bother you. You are now on the public dole. Are you ashamed? |
|
|
| (956990) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:38:37 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:34:53 2012. Ahem. I pay a monthly premium. Bridge plans are not Medicaid, they are not free. STFU. |
|
|
| (956991) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:39:34 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:37:41 2012. NoI am not. Bridge plans involved monthly premiums. They are NOT free. |
|
|
| (956992) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:41:12 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:38:37 2012. (STFU?) Are you against free speech? Other people are paying more because of you. You are driving up every one else's costs. Shut the fuck up and be greatful |
|
|
| (956997) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:48:32 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:41:12 2012. No,Bridge plans are being purchased at a group rate by all 50 states. They get a rate similar to, oh, let's say, a retirement fund or large public benefit corporation,like, oh, let's say, the MTA or Thruway Authority. In no way do they affect the general rates other groups or rich (because that's all that can afford those rates) individuals pay. THIW. I am in a group. So are you. You retirees with your clogged arteries are raising my rates. |
|
|
| (957000) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:52:09 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:48:32 2012. hahahah - are you peeking at my medical records again? I didn't know about the clogged arteries, though. How are my kidneys doing, as long as you are looking? |
|
|
| (957002) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:54:43 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:52:09 2012. I don't know but I'd bet they're costing we taxpayers plenty since you mention them. |
|
|
| (957004) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:59:10 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 21:54:43 2012. Your money is off-shore, remember? You get corporate welfare - remember? So how can you now claim to be a tax payer? Its getting that a reasonable person doesn't know which of your lies to believe. |
|
|
| (957007) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 22:21:35 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 21:59:10 2012. Guess you're not a reasonable person.You see, a reasonable person would have read that my employees are offshore because the underfunded American public school system doesn't produce anyone that does what we do. So we must hire offshore, in places that may seem poorer, but yet comprehend the value of investing in world-class education for their young people. They don't scrimp there like they do here. Nor do their banks steal away mathematicians and programmers in expectation of gaming the monetary system to serve their avarice, as the republicans permit. Any "corporate welfare" as you put it is based on the tax code a-la bush. The bush tax cuts enable us to not pay taxes. It's perfectly legal. I have a job where I receive wages. They are taxed, moron, same as any other American. Stop lying about what we do, and where the money is. You don't know shit about it. STFU for the second time tonight. |
|
|
| (957011) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 22:36:35 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Sun Jul 8 22:21:35 2012. As so you verify everything that I said and yet I'm somehow lying? Why don't you explain that to me. And because of that, you call me a moron At least when I call you a bitch, it's based on your behavior towards others. And for the 2nd time tonight - stop telling me to shut the fuck up, bitch, We have free speech in this country as of now and you do not own this board. Of course if you ever owned your own board - you could control what gets posted there (but we wouldn't want to go there would we?). |
|
|
| (957013) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 22:55:53 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 22:36:35 2012. But ... but ... but ... you're always telling me to shut up and butt out. Where's the rule that only republicans can flap their gums with impunity? :) |
|
|
| (957015) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:00:48 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 22:55:53 2012. You be getting silly, my friend. I think you need to go back and look again. You were questioning having a conversation with me. I 'splained to you how it came about and then told you that if you felt that it was a waste of time responding to me, then you should not respond. I don't recall ever telling you to shut up. |
|
|
| (957018) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 23:13:19 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:00:48 2012. You have your various ways of phrasing that thought ... I don't take it personally, this all amuses me and it's my duty as second banana to keep them laughing. But I gotta admit ... you DO say some interesting things ... it's like Art Linkletter all over again. :) |
|
|
| (957019) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:18:08 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 23:13:19 2012. Good, just so as we are both on the same page of the script |
|
|
| (957020) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 23:20:34 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:18:08 2012. No prob ... if I was genuinely pissed, we settle things with guns up here ... no pussyfooting. :) |
|
|
| (957021) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:25:53 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 23:20:34 2012. I'm flexible :-() |
|
|
| (957024) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 23:31:22 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 23:25:53 2012. So I've heard. :) |
|
|
| (957026) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 00:05:20 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 8 22:36:35 2012. You imagine reason to call me all sorts of things for merely breathing. I call you out on your behavior, each and every time. Let's not forget that 90% of the time your insult is overlooked by me, not rarely by anyone else here.I don't think anyone else here would consider the post that prompted that to be a "bitch" by any means, And certainly never for you. When you don't know what you're talking about your *should* STFU. Period. You went there twice tonight. I once owned the most popular BBS in upstate NY. We used to throw fabulous, epic parties every summer. The likes of you would never had fit in. This was a freethinking, civilized group where right & left discussed issues, occasionally persuaded each other's views and otherwise got along famously. No haters there. Saw some of them just a few weeks ago too. Great people. If this place could get along like that crowd.... |
|
|
| (957029) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 00:07:41 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jul 8 22:55:53 2012. And lie in the same breath as well. |
|
|
| (957030) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 00:14:00 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 00:05:20 2012. I guess some of the stories that I heard were true then. So what happened to it? |
|
|
| (957033) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 9 00:21:48 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 00:14:00 2012. Something called the internet ... have you heard of it? No busy signals when dialing in. We were one of the last BBS' to pull the plug in 1997. |
|
|
| (957034) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 9 00:23:18 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 9 00:21:48 2012. My bad ... 1999. |
|
|
| (957172) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 15:22:03 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 9 00:23:18 2012. Well that's reassuring. I heard some rumors that I found very hard to believe. |
|
|
| (957212) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 9 19:45:27 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 15:22:03 2012. We ran it for free, did it for fun out of our own pocket. I imagine somehow somebody seems to think it was some sort of business failure. LOL |
|
|
| (957231) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 21:02:36 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 15:22:03 2012. I can't see that would be any rumors, excluding those in your mind. It was a long time ago, long before I imagine you even had a computer. Back then it was solely tech hobbyists, no trolls. |
|
|
| (957240) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 22:02:51 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 21:02:36 2012. Yeah I know. I felt the same way. I almost couldn't believe what I heard. |
|
|
| (957241) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 22:16:34 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 22:02:51 2012. I doubt you actually heard anything. BBS-ing was limited, and nobody really remembers them aside from a small number of longtime geeks. Back when we ran the BBS, these were casual, above all local (long connection times and long distance charges quickly dissuaded long distance connecting) and limited to those that had what was at the time very expensive equipment. It was a time people like you....the mass of non-high tech hobbyists were even aware that BBS' and their fledgling networks existed. |
|
|
| (957243) | |
Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 9 22:28:51 2012, in response to Re: Job Numbers Disappointing Again, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 9 22:16:34 2012. Yeah you are probably right. After all, I probably just took a wild guess that you ran one. I mean - even a broken clock is right twice a day. Right? |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||