|
|
| Kamala Harris (1589759) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (1589759) | |
Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019 Sen. Harris will announce her candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination "on or about Martin Luther King day", as per her office.InB4 "likability"... |
|
|
| (1589761) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 17:10:54 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019. I'm thinking this may be the first time ever that I will watch all the debates. So many candidates; none of them ideal but none of them looking particularly objectionable either. |
|
|
| (1589764) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:15:54 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 17:10:54 2019. Me too. This is the way the democrat primaries SHOULD have been in 2016. Crowded field of serious qualified candidates and let the best win. |
|
|
| (1589765) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:01 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 17:10:54 2019. I didn't watch any of the primary debates in either 2008 or 2012. I only watched the 2016 debates because of a certain candidate whose participation I thought would make the debates entertaining. I should have thought of "Be careful what you wish for." |
|
|
| (1589766) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:39 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:15:54 2019. A crowded field of serious candidates in 2016 for the Republicans caused the shit to rise to the top instead. |
|
|
| (1589768) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:19:26 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:39 2019. I dunno if the democrats have 45's level shit 'serious' candidate that can run...lol |
|
|
| (1589774) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Jan 10 17:29:26 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019. Whos' next, DeBlasio?? |
|
|
| (1589776) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Jan 10 17:30:12 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Jan 10 17:29:26 2019. Prince Andrew |
|
|
| (1589782) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Jan 10 17:51:43 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019.  If he washes that paint off I might consider voting for him.
|
|
|
| (1589784) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 17:57:19 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:39 2019. As James Carville said, the Republicans have a primary voter quality problem. |
|
|
| (1589791) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 10 18:11:28 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019. She is another gun-grabber, a la Bloomberg. |
|
|
| (1589793) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 10 18:16:41 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:01 2019. He STILL is entertaining!! |
|
|
| (1589794) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:17:44 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:19:26 2019. It’s still early. |
|
|
| (1589795) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:17:45 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019. If she loses the Democrat primaries, no big deal.If she loses in the general election, it's racism. That's how it works. |
|
|
| (1589797) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:18:35 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Jan 10 17:51:43 2019. one of the all time greats. |
|
|
| (1589799) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:23:20 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:15:54 2019. Me too. This is the way the democrat primaries SHOULD have been in 2016. Crowded field of serious qualified candidates and let the best win. I disagree. The Dems are about collectivism and totalitarianism. They are anti-competition and that should show even in the primaries. The GOP is the party that should present itself as competitive. |
|
|
| (1589804) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:32:21 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:23:20 2019. LOL!Both parties were once about individualism, but it's the former Republican Party that's now about slavish devotion to leaders. Democrats are so much into collectivism that idiot Bernie Bros failed to vote for the Democratic candidate in 2016. You are so full of shit it's hilarious. |
|
|
| (1589805) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 18:33:13 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:23:20 2019. Lol GOP is Trump or bust right now... |
|
|
| (1589806) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:33:53 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:17:45 2019. Since the general election would be against Trump, the Democrats could nominate Whitey McWhitebred and his loss would still be about racism. |
|
|
| (1589807) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:38:08 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 18:33:13 2019. I'd say more people voted against Hillary than voted for Trump.I vote against New Haven Firefighters case, #irishcatholicism, etc........ |
|
|
| (1589808) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:40:22 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 10 18:16:41 2019. FALSE! |
|
|
| (1589809) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Jan 10 18:45:27 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:40:22 2019. Spider-Pig is entertaining. |
|
|
| (1589811) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Thu Jan 10 18:47:15 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:33:53 2019. +1 |
|
|
| (1589813) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Jan 10 18:48:32 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:18:35 2019. Not really, but I liked him. |
|
|
| (1589828) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 20:14:40 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Jan 10 18:45:27 2019. Thank you. I am. |
|
|
| (1589830) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 20:15:46 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Dave on Thu Jan 10 18:47:15 2019. I’m pretty sure you got it backwards, as your response is uncharacteristic. |
|
|
| (1589834) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 20:22:46 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 20:15:46 2019. Heh. I was wondering. :) |
|
|
| (1589837) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Jan 10 20:25:48 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 18:38:08 2019. "I'd say more people voted against Hillary than voted for Trump."I'd say you are correct, at least in my case "I vote against New Haven Firefighters case, #irishcatholicism, etc....." I'd say...ugh!!! |
|
|
| (1589841) | |
Re: Kamaltoe p Harris |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Thu Jan 10 20:37:29 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 17:10:54 2019. If she wears white stretch pants during the debate I may watch.j |
|
|
| (1589852) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu Jan 10 20:58:05 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Thu Jan 10 17:19:26 2019. Of course they do. |
|
|
| (1589853) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu Jan 10 21:00:34 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 17:16:01 2019. TDS |
|
|
| (1589854) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 21:06:39 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu Jan 10 21:00:34 2019. You’ve lost your mind. |
|
|
| (1589865) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:28:53 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 21:06:39 2019. you've lost your mind and your thread participation.I pointed out that 1. If Kamala loses the Dem primaries, racism is not the cause, 2. If Kamala loses the general election, racism is the cause, because Democrats can't be racist. My explanation is so point on, it frustrates CCCPig, clearaspect, Fred G, JayZeeBMT, Railman718, Easy, KFM, FBKLYN1959, Dand124, R Panse, Stephen Bauman, Joe V, dutchrail, and FtGreeneG. |
|
|
| (1589867) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:28:53 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 21:06:39 2019. you've lost your mind and your thread participation.I pointed out that 1. If Kamala loses the Dem primaries, racism is not the cause, 2. If Kamala loses the general election, racism is the cause, because Democrats can't be racist. My explanation is so point on, it frustrates CCCPig, clearaspect, Fred G, JayZeeBMT, Railman718, Easy, KFM, FBKLYN1959, Dand124, R Panse, Stephen Bauman, Joe V, dutchrail, and FtGreeneG. |
|
|
| (1589869) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 21:30:16 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:28:53 2019. Democrats can be racist. But most racists have been Republican for some time. |
|
|
| (1589871) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:36:12 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 21:30:16 2019. Ok. So you just explained why there is no reason why Kamala should lose the Democrat primary. |
|
|
| (1589879) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Jan 10 22:11:46 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:28:53 2019. LOL!/SpiderPig |
|
|
| (1589884) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 10 23:51:23 2019, in response to Kamala Harris, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 10 17:08:26 2019. InB4 "likability"That's a Democratic talking point, so no. Surprised you didn't mention Willie Brown, upon whose unmentionables (especially their contents) she rode into politics. Jezebel and Athaliah come to mind. |
|
|
| (1589885) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 10 23:52:36 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:36:12 2019. Do the "superdelegates" approve of her? |
|
|
| (1589886) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 00:06:55 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 10 21:28:53 2019. Lol you think a lot of your post and it's effect on other posters. If Kamala won you would be the first one to say it's bc she's black and a woman. |
|
|
| (1589889) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 00:31:38 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 00:06:55 2019. Lol you think a lot of your post and it's effect on other postersno one can dispute the double-standard. THIW Dems can't be racist. That's how it's portrayed. I think highly of my post. If Kamala won you would be the first one to say it's bc she's black and a woman. well yeah, why do you think she will announce on MLK day? She is exploiting her skin color and making herself a racial candidate from the start. |
|
|
| (1589890) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 00:34:52 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 10 23:52:36 2019. If they don't approve, they're racists. |
|
|
| (1589891) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 00:56:16 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 00:31:38 2019. There democrat racists there just seem to be a lot more Republican racists... Look at Peter King asking about why White supremist is racist, GOPers in Texas trying to fire a party chair for being Muslim... Etc etc |
|
|
| (1589892) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 01:23:45 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 00:56:16 2019. you're party is now obligated to nominate Kamala. THIWNot to praise my brilliance, but it was I who said that once Obama won the primaries in 2008, the Dems could never nominate a white male again. |
|
|
| (1589893) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 11 01:26:14 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 01:23:45 2019. If Biden gets it then, will you eat your words? |
|
|
| (1589894) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 01:36:02 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 11 01:26:14 2019. Yes.I will eat my words. Kamala is probably looking at how close the midterms were in Georgia and Florida and thinks she can win. I think it's realistic. |
|
|
| (1589895) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:47:35 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 10 18:40:22 2019. Look at all if the Subchat Off-topic entertainment that you guys provide for me on a weekly basis! |
|
|
| (1589896) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 01:49:02 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:47:35 2019. CCCPig is become quite the comedian.So are others. |
|
|
| (1589902) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 02:06:28 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 01:36:02 2019. Bookmarked.Kamala Harris is nowhere near the favorite. Weirder things have happened but I doubt it. |
|
|
| (1589903) | |
Re: Kamala Harris |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 11 02:08:27 2019, in response to Re: Kamala Harris, posted by FtgreeneG on Fri Jan 11 02:06:28 2019. If she does not win nomination, how can racism not be the reason? |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|