|
|
| So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"? (978119) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (978119) | |
So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 11:58:45 2012 yes they should. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (978120) | |
Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 23 12:01:57 2012, in response to So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"?, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 11:58:45 2012. . . . like people who obsess over the Koch Brothers? and link to Media Matters and Raw Story? |
|
|
| (978122) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 23 12:05:30 2012, in response to So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"?, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 11:58:45 2012. Yes because they ARE.With the exceptionof Akin. IIRC, they withdrew. |
|
|
| (978123) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 23 12:08:22 2012, in response to Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 23 12:01:57 2012. Were they not trying to buy an election, there would be no reason to even consider their existence. However, their evil intent brought it on itself. |
|
|
| (978125) | |
Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 12:13:57 2012, in response to Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 23 12:01:57 2012. Which one is you? LOLyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (978131) | |
Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Aug 23 12:30:13 2012, in response to Re: So...Should certain libs be hospitalized?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 23 12:01:57 2012. I wish someone would study the liberals werido crushes on random people no ones ever heard of.Liberal foundations give how much, 7000% more than these random folks do? |
|
|
| (978166) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Aug 23 12:57:09 2012, in response to So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"?, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 11:58:45 2012. As long as Democrats are known as Soros monkeys. |
|
|
| (978169) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 12:58:26 2012, in response to Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Aug 23 12:57:09 2012. Doesn't have the same bullseye.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (978191) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 23 13:27:33 2012, in response to Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Aug 23 12:57:09 2012. There's a well known and somewhat loved monkey in Tampa that flings poo at people it doesn't like. He's waiting in Willard, he's waiting on Lyin'. |
|
| (978247) | |
Re: So...Should Republicans be known as ''Koch Suckers''? |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Thu Aug 23 15:59:33 2012, in response to So...Should Republicans be known as "Koch Suckers"?, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 23 11:58:45 2012. Love it. |
|
|