|
|
| First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate (964244) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (964244) | |
First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Jul 27 19:16:21 2012 http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/07/judge-bars-birth-control-mandate/ |
|
|
| (964271) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by Italianstallion on Fri Jul 27 19:57:50 2012, in response to First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Jul 27 19:16:21 2012. And probably the last. |
|
|
| (964277) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Fri Jul 27 20:03:23 2012, in response to First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Jul 27 19:16:21 2012. It won't survive appeal.By then rules will have finalized for self-insuring companies, and they will have to comply. If they want to do the medieval thing, they'll have to find individuals that are willing to voluntarily comply with 15th century attitudes. |
|
|
| (964327) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Jul 27 22:02:13 2012, in response to First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Jul 27 19:16:21 2012. You do realize, don't you, that almost half the states have similar mandates?There's no way freedom of religion can only apply against federal laws and not state laws. The Supreme Court has long ruled that the same restrictions apply to both states and the federal government. |
|
|
| (964328) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jul 27 22:03:34 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by AlM on Fri Jul 27 22:02:13 2012. Going to be interesting to see where this goes. Once again, a corporation versus a church ... and not even an organization, a company. A regular company. |
|
|
| (964331) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Fri Jul 27 22:15:52 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jul 27 22:03:34 2012. Since they are self-insured, they will have to comply with the laws for self insured corporations. That's it. Overturned on appeal. What are they gonna do, pay the fines for non-coverage and send their employees to the exchanges where contraceptive coverage is legally mandated?If they want to have a "Catholic" company, they should 1) pay enough to support families of 12+ children 2) support their female employees through all those pregnancies, maternity leaves and hold their jobs until they return, plus daycare and preschool so they can work 3) provide healthcare coverage for them all. Then their female employees will be supported in the choice to not use contraceptives. |
|
|
| (964373) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jul 28 03:00:10 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by bingbong on Fri Jul 27 20:03:23 2012. By what logical reasoning do you contend that it will not survive an appeal? |
|
|
| (964428) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Jul 28 10:36:51 2012, in response to First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Jul 27 19:16:21 2012. It's just a temporary injunction, not a ruling.This is going nowhere. |
|
|
| (964456) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Jul 28 12:37:29 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jul 28 03:00:10 2012. Maybe because 20 states have similar laws that haven't been overturned? That doesn't make it a sure thing, but it's an indication. |
|
|
| (964457) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jul 28 12:39:45 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by AlM on Sat Jul 28 12:37:29 2012. Remember the golden rule ... "It ISN'T 'judicial activism' when conservative judges do it." :) |
|
|
| (964475) | |
Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jul 28 13:08:07 2012, in response to Re: First judicial victory against ACA birth control mandate, posted by AlM on Sat Jul 28 12:37:29 2012. Then the poster should have said that it will "likely" not survive an appeal? |
|
|