|
|
| Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions (955130) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (955610) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 22:49:15 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 4 22:18:22 2012. C'mon man ... I read it on OTchat! It *MUST* be true! :) |
|
|
| (955611) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 22:50:54 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 22:49:15 2012. you should listen to c2aAM. lots going on. |
|
|
| (955612) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 22:51:27 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 22:28:39 2012. Nope ... merely observing that our friends on the right here aren't made of sugar and spice either. :)And what fight? I treat you a whole lot more civilly than others, no? |
|
|
| (955613) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:43:43 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 21:37:48 2012. I do know however like all government programs that start off with good intentions the results won't be as good.Social security are perfect examples of this. |
|
|
| (955614) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 23:47:26 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:43:43 2012. Oh ok, so you don't really know what the bill is all about.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (955615) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:51:22 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 4 21:57:06 2012. Have you read all 2,700 pages?Did you know that the law states the "secretary shall" over 1,005 times? Many portions of the law shall be decided by the secretary as needed! You don't care however, you are already in MediCal! And are of the 8 million plus on SSI! Good for you! |
|
|
| (955616) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:52:07 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 23:47:26 2012. You have read all 2,700 pages Fred!? |
|
|
| (955617) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Jul 5 00:03:50 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:52:07 2012. Nope and don't have to.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (955620) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jul 5 00:08:08 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Fred G on Thu Jul 5 00:03:50 2012. LOL |
|
|
| (955621) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jul 5 00:09:05 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:51:22 2012. LOL |
|
|
| (955622) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Jul 5 00:14:28 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012. Waaahhh...those other people are so bad. Mommy, make them go away!!your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (955623) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:14:35 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 22:45:17 2012. Excepting that he won't be elected. He's a fucking idiot that doesn't have a plan, doesn't have a stand and doesn't have a clue.In politics, candidates that run from their record are called losers. Hell, this one is even running from his own given name. |
|
|
| (955624) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:15:41 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 22:51:27 2012. Not in the least. I don't know what they're made of but it sure smells funny. |
|
|
| (955625) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:17:44 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:43:43 2012. Then why is Social Security so popular?Seems everyone on it is happy with the result. I look forward to seeing my ROI, which for much of my working life has been double since I either self-employed or was an employer. |
|
|
| (955626) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jul 5 00:18:42 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:17:44 2012. right on !LOL |
|
|
| (955627) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:21:40 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Fred G on Thu Jul 5 00:03:50 2012. No one does. Why read 30 pages on the legal definition of "family". That's what much of that paper is dedicated to...definitions. IN this day and age, especially seeing some on the RW that cannot comprehend a simple concept such as general acceptance of colloquial language in a certain time, time and trees need be spent defining the meaning of every pertinent word and context for the shitheads. Then these same shitheads whine about the size of the bill. |
|
|
| (955628) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:43:28 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 22:28:39 2012. You're wrong on principle alone. Then you're wrong on reality.It's the conservatives that push the policies of hate. Don't you get that throwing 11 million people off their health insurance - which they are paying premiums for - plan is wrong? |
|
|
| (955630) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 00:49:35 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 23:43:43 2012. So you don't want yours? Feel free to endorse them over to me then. :) |
|
|
| (955631) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:00:50 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:14:35 2012. He's a fucking idiot? Is he more successful than you? That must mean that you are a much bigger fucking idiot.In recent days you've made the following claims but refuse or are unable to prove any of the claims. 1)BMW is moving from South Carolina to Detroit because the people in South Carolina are untrainable. 2)The term, “CONSCRIPTION” is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution 3)A lot of abortions in this country are due to pregnancies caused by broken condoms. 4)A Medical Waste Company that Mitt Romney was allegedly associated with, disposed of bio-hazard waste in an unsafe manner.  |
|
|
| (955632) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:02:18 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:43:28 2012. What 11 million are you talking about? This sounds like more of your hate filled bullshit. |
|
|
| (955633) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 01:04:48 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:00:50 2012. Until you read th earticles provided to begin with, and can comprehend what your read;
|
|
|
| (955634) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 01:07:20 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:02:18 2012. ACA Bridge Plan qualified (est) nationally). |
|
|
| (955636) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:10:13 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 01:04:48 2012. FUCK OFF SEA HAG!  |
|
|
| (955637) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:11:24 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 01:07:20 2012. As I said, just more of your bullshit |
|
|
| (955641) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jul 5 02:09:17 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012. 
|
|
|
| (955668) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 07:37:08 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:11:24 2012. Sorry to see facts annoy you. Uncomfortable with the thought that the republicans would just as soon let millions die for lack of medical care access..... |
|
|
| (955741) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 13:56:57 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 07:37:08 2012. Just one :) |
|
|
| (955889) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 20:45:47 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 13:56:57 2012. So you're wishing harm upon me.......why?That's a hateful statement. This isn't your place and I have just as much of a right to be here as you per Larry. |
|
|
| (955894) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:11:28 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 20:45:47 2012. I make no secret that I do not like you. I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire but you've made many more vitriolic statements about my leisure activities and the risks. So, yeah, suck it up and move on. |
|
|
| (955898) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jul 5 21:22:22 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 00:15:41 2012. Like chicken shit? |
|
|
| (955899) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 21:22:49 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:11:28 2012. Your answer evades the question. It's a very direct question. Answer it. Yes or no.I have no reason to move on yet. You do. |
|
|
| (955902) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 21:26:07 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jul 5 21:22:22 2012. Could be. |
|
|
| (955903) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:27:20 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 21:22:49 2012. I've never wished harm on you or anyone else here (unlike you who has, openly, many times). I wouldn't care if you lost your medical insurance coverage which is what you accuse every right wing person of, anyway. Now have yourself a couple of doughnuts and then go howl at the moon. |
|
|
| (955905) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 21:28:29 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jul 5 21:22:22 2012. Next time ... the PIG farm! It's more like that particular "fresh country scent." :) |
|
|
| (955911) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 21:42:46 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:27:20 2012. When, in your opinion did that happen?Loss of insurance to anyone with a pre-existing condition is seen by many as a wish for harm. What you said DOES WRT that means you DO wish me harm. |
|
|
| (955913) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:45:57 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 21:42:46 2012. What the fuck are you blathering about? |
|
|
| (955923) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 22:08:18 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 21:27:20 2012. When, in your opinion did that happen?Loss of insurance to anyone with a pre-existing condition is seen by many as a wish for harm. What you said means you DO wish me harm. |
|
|
| (955925) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 22:14:21 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 22:08:18 2012. Loss of insurance only means that you'd have to pay for your own treatment just like before you had the coverage. If I wanted to wish you harm I'd suggest that you "Die in a fire" or "Get washed away in a mud slide". You may be the most irritating person that I know but I'll leave the harming you to a higher power. Now go take some prozac and stop being such a drama-queen bitch. |
|
|
| (955947) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Jul 5 22:42:53 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 22:14:21 2012. Loss of insurance means bankruptcy for too many. Do you think I'm the only person with this problem? |
|
|
| (955951) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Jul 5 22:45:56 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 01:10:13 2012. Fight nicely you two!!! |
|
|
| (955959) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 22:52:20 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Jul 5 22:45:56 2012. That's OK ... I've seen this all before. He WANTS her ... this is his mating ritual. LOL |
|
|
| (955966) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:02:05 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 22:52:20 2012. With all due respect, Kevin, no! |
|
|
| (955970) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:19:50 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:02:05 2012. C'mon, man ... it's so obvious even your friends are noticing it. We were laughing about it at our tardchat picnic here today ... you KNOW you want it! I can fix you up, but it's gonna cost ya. Heh. |
|
|
| (955973) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:26:16 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:19:50 2012. you had a picnic and I was not invited?All kiding aside, I was never the kid who dipped the cute girl's pigtails in the inkwell. Thank you but this is one time where I don't believe that the grass is greener. |
|
|
| (955975) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jul 5 23:28:55 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:19:50 2012. C'mon, man ... it's so obvious even your friends are noticing it.All i notice is that interaction i find amusing I can tell ya yer wifey def isnt Steves Cup of tea... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder no? |
|
|
| (955976) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:29:59 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:26:16 2012. Oh it is ... wafting with fresh country scent too. :) |
|
|
| (955977) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:31:18 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jul 5 23:28:55 2012. Now did I say you? But yeah, I'm old enough to spot a fetish. :)Maybe it's alzheimers but geez ... even Hooters waitresses don't get that much attention. Heh. |
|
|
| (955979) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:32:41 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jul 5 23:28:55 2012. Are you hinting that I like chocolate? |
|
|
| (955980) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jul 5 23:33:39 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jul 5 23:31:18 2012. Think about it for a sec dont it cross yer mind that hes actually having FUN doing this??She gave it to him good last week i noticed it.. Hes giving it back.. |
|
|
| (955981) | |
Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jul 5 23:34:05 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 5 23:32:41 2012. I didnt say that now did I? |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||