Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  

(955130)

view threaded

Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by DAND124 on Tue Jul 3 16:04:38 2012

fiogf49gjkf0d
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/roberts_wrote_both_obamacare_opinions/

Post a New Response

(955189)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 17:58:03 2012, in response to Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by DAND124 on Tue Jul 3 16:04:38 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nancy Pelosi was wrong.

She said we need to pass it to find out whats in it.

Well we passed it, and we still don't know whats in it, like is it a tax or fee or penalty?

Its sort of like saying you need your refund to pay school loans.

Post a New Response

(955192)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 3 18:00:02 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 17:58:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Just because you don't know doesn't mean that no one else does.

Post a New Response

(955205)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 18:13:33 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 17:58:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Obummerlie

End of story!


Post a New Response

(955271)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 20:34:32 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 18:13:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And it's not.

Post a New Response

(955279)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 21:06:36 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 20:34:32 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
According to the Supreme Court it is. In fact, o'bummer care boasts of 20 taxes

Post a New Response

(955286)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 21:29:06 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 21:06:36 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL. I thought conservatives disagreed with Roberts's opinion.

Romney's own spokesman told Fox News it was a penalty, not a tax. That's because Romneycare had the exact same mechanism.

Post a New Response

(955288)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 21:33:38 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 21:29:06 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Then I suggest that you ask Romney the question. You asked me so I answered for me.

Post a New Response

(955291)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 21:50:48 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 21:33:38 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are not running for President.

Post a New Response

(955292)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 3 21:58:25 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 21:50:48 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not this time around but I assume that you wanted my opinion for a reason.

Post a New Response

(955511)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 13:58:45 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 17:58:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Does it matter what it is called ?

When you pull money out of an IRA or 410K when you aren't supposed to to, you pay for it on the next tax return. That's called a "Penalty" even though it goes to the IRS.

Post a New Response

(955512)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 14:01:00 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 21:29:06 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heritage Foundation called for "Mandate" in Dolecare in 1993, which evolved into Romneycare. Obamacare transcends not from Hillarycare, but from Dolecare. Conservatives should be very happy, but have short memories.

Post a New Response

(955536)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Jul 4 14:58:31 2012, in response to Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by DAND124 on Tue Jul 3 16:04:38 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The source is CBS News...they have been corroborated on Fast and Furious, but I need to see corroboration of the anonymous source here. (CBS broke the F&F story.)

Post a New Response

(955542)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 15:19:56 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Italianstallion on Tue Jul 3 20:34:32 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Willard said so. At least he said so "yesterday" (which may be the day before yesterday, Terrorpin traindud & any other OCD types that haven't manifested themselves as of yet)e

Today he's saying different.

Post a New Response

(955545)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 15:46:55 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 15:19:56 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
OT in OT: Where did the nickname "Willard" come from ?

Post a New Response

(955547)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 16:15:27 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 15:46:55 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's his name.

Post a New Response

(955548)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Rockparkman on Wed Jul 4 16:16:13 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 15:46:55 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The Nazi candidate's full name is Willard Mitt Romney.

Post a New Response

(955551)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 4 17:22:29 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Rockparkman on Wed Jul 4 16:16:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Mitt=Milton, LOL

Post a New Response

(955554)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 17:58:53 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 4 17:22:29 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL! Didn't know that. Wow, Willard Milton Rmoney. That's a upperclass milquetoast name if there ever was one.

Post a New Response

(955555)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 4 17:59:51 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Rockparkman on Wed Jul 4 16:16:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
iawtp

Post a New Response

(955556)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by TERRapin station on Wed Jul 4 18:29:34 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 3 18:00:02 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
+1

Post a New Response

(955559)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 20:46:26 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Rockparkman on Wed Jul 4 16:16:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well the right-winged radio talk show nuts love to use Obama's middle name, Hussein. Yet I see no one except MSNBC using the Willard name, and not Milton at all.

Post a New Response

(955560)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 4 20:50:50 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 20:46:26 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
yep
iawtp

Post a New Response

(955561)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 20:55:25 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 20:46:26 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You should start doing it here. Maybe it will catch on nationally.

Post a New Response

(955563)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 20:59:20 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 3 18:00:02 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Doesn't seem like Obama or Pelosi don't either!

Post a New Response

(955565)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 21:18:18 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 20:46:26 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yet. It's catching on.

Post a New Response

(955566)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 21:20:33 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 21:18:18 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Once he's president, it may be even more popular

Post a New Response

(955568)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:24:05 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Joe V on Wed Jul 4 20:46:26 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If someone says "Willard", they're a moron.

Hussein works. Willard doesn't.

Post a New Response

(955569)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 21:27:02 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:24:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The use of "Willard", in the childish liberal mind, is supposed to get conservatives all upset and bothered. If using Willard get's bing-bong's panties wet, I say let her enjoy herself.

Post a New Response

(955571)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 21:27:02 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Most liberals are childish, vengeful, hateful, angry, people.

Post a New Response

(955572)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 21:31:59 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by TERRapin station on Wed Jul 4 18:29:34 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Do you know all 2,700 pages of the bill?



Post a New Response

(955573)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:33:08 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:24:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, but when you combine Willard and Milton, you end up with the next best thing to Shecky. Have we seen the long form birth certificate yet? :)

Post a New Response

(955574)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 21:33:11 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You see here all the time.

When you disagree with them they will tell you they hope you lose your job and become homeless!
Yet these are issues that they are so important to them!

Post a New Response

(955575)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 4 21:33:29 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 17:58:53 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, his actual name is "Willard Mitt Romney."

Post a New Response

(955578)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 21:37:04 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(955579)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 21:37:48 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 21:31:59 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You sure don't.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(955585)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 21:49:11 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:24:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Willard is his name. Get used to it. You're going to hear it a lot. It's like the RW dogwhistles.

Post a New Response

(955587)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:56:12 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Double lol! :)

Post a New Response

(955588)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 4 21:57:06 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 4 21:37:48 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL !

Post a New Response

(955589)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:57:08 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 4 21:33:29 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
False.

It's "Willard MILTON Romney" ... look it up.

Post a New Response

(955592)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 22:04:15 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 4 17:22:29 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Still preferable to barack.

Post a New Response

(955595)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:05:54 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 21:31:27 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah sure. Right.

Conservatives have stated that they intend to prevent people with pre-existing conditions leaving them to die. That's really compassionate and sensitive of them. They don't want to see that children once born have enough to eat, yet the value of a fetus, and the control the risks of pregnancy put upon women, is paramount. They want to kill off the public school system that existed since before the American revolution, so they don't care if kids get the education they will need to function as adults within the economy. Those kids only exist to be putinto the military to be killed in wars of convenience. That's super intelligent forward thinking. Sure right,looch

/sarcasm

Post a New Response

(955597)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 22:07:54 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:05:54 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Break out the fucking violins. Nancy is going to play her favorite song

Post a New Response

(955598)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:07:56 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:33:08 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL! He won't release it! Milkquetoast!

Post a New Response

(955599)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:13:17 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 22:07:54 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Sounds better than your anthem:


Post a New Response

(955601)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 4 22:18:22 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:57:08 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, it's not!

Post a New Response

(955602)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:20:37 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 21:20:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You're clueless. Nobody calling him by his actual given name wants to see him elected.

Post a New Response

(955604)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 4 22:28:39 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 4 21:56:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm right.

But I see what you're doing.

ChrisR16 is gone, and you're trying to bait me into a fight. Bait me into giving jobs reports and other bad news but it won't work. I'm not taking his job.

Post a New Response

(955605)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 4 22:34:00 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 22:05:54 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
iawtp

Post a New Response

(955609)

view threaded

Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 4 22:45:17 2012, in response to Re: Roberts wrote both Obamacare opinions, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 4 21:49:11 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Once he gets elected, you'll be wearing "I LOVE WILLARD" Panties with built in sponges for that extra dewy feeling.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]