Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 8

Next Page >  

(954573)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:37:31 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 01:29:21 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
they are all on driver's side. people walk up to them too.

i'm just saying the case of making a mini golf course ADA compliant at every hole is a bit of a stretch.

Post a New Response

(954574)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:38:48 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:35:16 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
a legit terrorist group canvassing NYC and surrounding boroughs would feel like they're in a foreign country. it's not an american city anymore. lonewolf nut does not count.

Post a New Response

(954576)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 01:41:24 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:37:31 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'll bet we spent more ourselves for ADA compliance in our software that the golf course ever will ... but once you've done it, everybody happy.

Post a New Response

(954577)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:43:22 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 00:13:47 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I agree totally. Instead of fighting fare increases, the TWU should be fighting for a fair contract for its members. Instead of protesting about people being searched for illegal weapons, the TWU should be more worried about the safety of its members who are less likely to be carrying said illegal guns. Remember when the TWU would get rid of the unsafe fuck-ups?

Or endorsing Obama in May, months before the election, without getting a contract first.

No one has any respect for TWU workers anymore. Sad, because TWU workers do so much to keep NY moving. People now laugh at transit workers.


Post a New Response

(954578)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:45:13 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:38:48 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's not how NYC was attacked by terrorists.

Post a New Response

(954579)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:46:18 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:45:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's was attacked by Saudi Arabia. They specifically attacked a financial institution.

Post a New Response

(954586)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 03:44:15 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:45:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
did you hear about the attack on a church in Kenya?

Post a New Response

(954587)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Fred G on Mon Jul 2 04:02:36 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:24:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The wide bathrooms are better for everyone.

Your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(954588)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 04:08:56 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:26:32 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Go fuck yourself. Your posts are nothing but bullshit. You are just a delusion douche bag who makes shit up. It must suck to be you.

Post a New Response

(954589)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 04:10:17 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 01:41:24 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pwned.

Post a New Response

(954590)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 04:13:11 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jul 1 23:41:19 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wrong again dumbass.

Post a New Response

(954593)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 04:20:42 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Fred G on Mon Jul 2 04:02:36 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
He's absolutely convinced that all of this is keeping the trains away from Puxsatawny. :)

Post a New Response

(954594)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 04:28:27 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:24:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
ADA seating on a train is reasonable. Making every hole at a mini golf course ADA compliant is not.

Post a New Response

(954597)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 05:21:53 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 03:44:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, I did. CNN actually got it right in implicating al-Shabaab (Somalia's al-Qa'eda division).

Post a New Response

(954600)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by ClearAspect on Mon Jul 2 06:17:24 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:24:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The Nazi supports Discrimination!

Post a New Response

(954604)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Fred G on Mon Jul 2 06:26:51 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 2 01:24:03 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Like I was saying, we like the wider bathrooms.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(954648)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:56:40 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 2 01:37:31 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not to mention that the user of the ATM can be the BACKSEAT PASSENGER! It makes more sense to accommodate them that way than to install a duplicate ATM on the passenger side.

Post a New Response

(954649)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:59:21 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Jul 1 23:30:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And to tie in another part of the thread, people didn't choose to get preëxisting conditions either. People shouldn't be held personally responsible for "acts of God" that they couldn't avoid.

Post a New Response

(954650)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:02:15 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 00:13:47 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Good post. These "extracurricular activities" among many unions is part of the reason why people don't respect unions anymore.

Post a New Response

(954651)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:04:52 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jul 1 23:41:19 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Obamacare doesn't benefit me either, but I actually care about others.

Post a New Response

(954652)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 10:05:43 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 00:13:47 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Steve dont get me started....

Post a New Response

(954655)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:25:16 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 10:05:43 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Rob, as a former TWU member and as one who still interacts, all I can say is that we need more people to get started. And I say that regardless of what side of the fence I was on or will be on in the future.

Post a New Response

(954658)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:31:00 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:56:40 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Also, producing one bezel with braille and using it in all applications, whether it is needed or not is more efficient & cost effective than producing 2 different units.

Post a New Response

(954659)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Jul 2 10:31:06 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:56:40 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not to mention that the user of the ATM can be the BACKSEAT PASSENGER! It makes more sense to accommodate them that way than to install a duplicate ATM on the passenger side.

And it would cost more for ATM manufacturers to tool separate keypads for walkup and driveup models.

Post a New Response

(954661)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:38:10 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 09:59:21 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Which brings us to this:

What if, in college, some person was doing lots and lots of drugs and 20 years later finds that their liver or kidneys are fucked up? Certainly no act of god and the risks were foreseeable and predictable.

Post a New Response

(954665)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:43:00 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:04:52 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's hardly a unique statement. I doubt that there are any here who don't care about other people despite what the rhetoric-mongers would have people believe. There are some that are against o'bummercare because they do not believe that it is the best or even a good way to achieve the end which is sought.

Post a New Response

(954666)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:44:33 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:38:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But by mandating insurance coverage, the person has presumably paid into insurance over time.

Post a New Response

(954667)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:45:51 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:43:00 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I never meant to imply that being against Obamacare implied one was heartless, only that that is my personal reason for supporting it.

I also support Obamacare because I am opposed to a single payer system.

Post a New Response

(954669)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:49:15 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:44:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Unless we are talking about a person who claims a pre-existing condition and has, up until now, had no coverage. (and I'm speaking of no one in particular). So that person has not paid into the system and has brought the disease upon themself.

Post a New Response

(954670)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:50:03 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 10:45:51 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I didn't include you among the rhetoric-mongers.

Post a New Response

(954671)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Jul 2 11:02:54 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:49:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Unless we are talking about a person who claims a pre-existing condition and has, up until now, had no coverage. (and I'm speaking of no one in particular). So that person has not paid into the system and has brought the disease upon themself.

All the law says is they can't be denied coverage. They'll still be paying more.

Post a New Response

(954674)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 11:28:55 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:49:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, that is a problem, but won't be over time with the mandate. The idea is to prevent people from free riding on others.

Post a New Response

(954680)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 11:51:06 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:38:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's something that happens at a lower rate than those requiring constant care after a automobile or motorcycle accident. Most serious injury causing accidents are the result of reckless behavior on the part of one of the parties involved, often both.

And in all 3 cases the necessary care should be provided with question. The national insurance pool should be sufficient to cover those exceptions. Model such care after the VA, which provides lifetime benefits to military personnel injury victims in as cost effective a manner as possible.

Post a New Response

(954684)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 11:52:16 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 11:51:06 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
...that's WITHOUT question. My bad, said the professional typoist.

Post a New Response

(954697)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 12:11:05 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 11:51:06 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey douche bag, you were not invited into this discussion. Mind your own fucking business.

Post a New Response

(954706)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 12:38:25 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 12:11:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Livid!!!!!!

Post a New Response

(954711)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 12:42:56 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 12:11:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Adding a comment that is on topic nor steers the conversation away, nor insults anyone involved is not trolling.

Your response is.

Post a New Response

(954728)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 14:25:19 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 12:42:56 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The original comment that I made was directed to another poster. It only referred to the accuracy of your response to him, which as usual was out in left field. You said that I was unwelcome to participate in the thread. You said that I was trolling. You can't even keep your lies straight, trailer trash. My referring to you as a douche bag was an unfortunate comment that I will apologize to the makers of douche-bags, for. It demeans their useful product by comparing it to a useless hag. You are too deeply involved in my life. One might even say that you are obsessed. Go take two doughnuts and lie down.

Post a New Response

(954730)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 14:27:57 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 12:38:25 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm actually in quite the celebratory mood today.

Post a New Response

(954736)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 14:49:29 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jun 30 20:54:02 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
TrainDude is correct, again!

Colonial to 1861

In colonial times, the Thirteen Colonies used a militia system for defense. Colonial militia laws—and after independence those of the United States and the various states—required able-bodied males to enroll in the militia, to undergo a minimum of military training, and to serve for limited periods of time in war or emergency. This earliest form of conscription involved selective drafts of militiamen for service in particular campaigns. Following this system in its essentials, the Continental Congress in 1778 recommended that the states draft men from their militias for one year's service in the Continental army; this first national conscription was irregularly applied and failed to fill the Continental ranks.

For long-term operations, conscription was occasionally used when volunteers or paid substitutes were insufficient to raise the needed manpower. During the American Revolutionary War, the states sometimes drafted men for militia duty or to fill state Continental Army units, but the central government did not have the authority to conscript. President James Madison and his Secretary of War James Monroe unsuccessfully attempted to create a national draft of 40,000 men during the War of 1812.[3] This proposal was fiercely criticized on the Senate floor by antiwar Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts.[4]



"The administration asserts the right to fill the ranks of the regular army by compulsion.... Is this, sir, consistent with the character of a free government? Is this civil liberty? Is this the real character of our Constitution? No, sir, indeed it is not.... Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents, and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war, in which the folly or the wickedness of government may engage it? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden, which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest rights of personal liberty?



Daniel Webster (December 9, 1814 House of Representatives Address)


[edit] Civil War

The United States first employed national conscription during the American Civil War. The vast majority of troops were volunteers; however, of the 2,100,000 Union soldiers, about 2% were draftees, and another 6% were paid substitutes.[5][6]

The South had far fewer inhabitants than the North, and Confederate President Jefferson Davis proposed the first conscription act on March 28, 1862; it was passed into law the next month.[7]

Resistance was both widespread and violent, with comparisons made between conscription and slavery. Both sides permitted conscripts to hire substitutes to serve in their place. In the Union, many states and cities offered bounties and bonuses for enlistment. They also arranged to take credit against their draft quota by claiming freed slaves who enlisted in the Union Army.

Although both North and South resorted to conscription, the system did not work effectively in either. The Confederate Congress on April 16, 1862, passed an act requiring military service for three years from all males aged eighteen to thirty-five not legally exempt; it later extended the obligation. The U.S. Congress followed with the Militia Act of 1862 authorizing a militia draft within a state when it could not meet its quota with volunteers. This state-administered system failed in practice and in 1863 Congress passed the Enrollment Act, the first genuine national conscription law, setting up under the Union Army an elaborate machinery for enrolling and drafting men between twenty and forty-five years of age. Quotas were assigned in each state, the deficiencies in volunteers required to be met by conscription.

Still, men drafted could provide substitutes, and until mid-1864 could even avoid service by paying commutation money. Many eligible men pooled their money to cover the cost of anyone of them drafted. Families used the substitute provision to select which member should go into the army and which would stay home. Of the 168,649 men procured for the Union Army through the draft, 117,986 were substitutes, leaving only 50,663 who had their personal services conscripted. There was much evasion and overt resistance to the draft, and the New York City draft riots were in direct response to the draft and were the earliest known mass resistance against the draft in the United States. Although there is a tendency to blame immigrants for Civil War draft resistance, this probably reflects Nativist prejudices of the time; few remember that after brief Confederate service the able-bodied Mark Twain spent the Civil War years in Nevada and California. Many others went West to avoid serving in either army.

The problem of Confederate desertion was aggravated by the inequitable inclinations of conscription officers and local judges. The three conscription acts of the Confederacy exempted certain categories, most notably the planter class, and enrolling officers and local judges often practiced favoritism, sometimes accepting bribes. Attempts to effectively deal with the issue were frustrated by conflict between state and local governments on the one hand and the national government of the Confederacy.[8]


Post a New Response

(954739)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 14:51:14 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 14:49:29 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Plagiarism's bad. m'kay.

Post a New Response

(954740)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 14:51:20 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 14:25:19 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It was phrased in the form of an insult. It was clearly intended as such. That is trolling. There are civilized ways to handle such a situation when your opinion differs. You're incapable of that. You have a history here, and everyone sees it as such, same as when you troll anyone that doesn't share your perverse, hateful, callous worldview lockstep.

You, as a civil service retiree are truly the "useless hag". I have a job, I contribute. I also assist with my husband's venture, so I actually have 2 jobs. You haven't created a single thing besides pointless middle management paperwork when you did have the job until they convinced you of a means out of.

You can have the donuts. I don't partake. You obviously do. I have to watch my diet.

Go take your expensive gift and use it for its intended purpose. Go away.

Post a New Response

(954751)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 15:26:51 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 14:51:14 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not meant to plagiarize.
Just quoting and researching the "Draft and conscript" in the US of A.
It is not in the Constitution as claimed by others here.

Post a New Response

(954752)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 15:28:34 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 15:26:51 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Right. Just trying to humorously say that next time remember to copy and paste the URL.

Post a New Response

(954755)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 15:40:19 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 2 15:28:34 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Henceforth, I will direct the reader, that the following is a quote per so, and so, about such, and such.

I only like to phlegminize!

Post a New Response

(954803)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 18:41:19 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 10:38:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Sorta like those who were prescribed prescription drugs from Glaxo-Smith-Klein? Oh yeah ... corporate drugs given by a physician are OK when they do this. Maybe you'll get a $30.00 settlement to offset those costs.

Post a New Response

(954818)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 21:49:37 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 14:51:20 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
When I criticize you its for your behavior or your idiotic comments on this venue. You are obsessed with my private life. You are obsessed with my career. You are obsessed with my hobbies. I don't care about your alleged two jobs. They obviously amount to nil. Bring your squirt bottle and a clean rag next week. I'll give you a half a buck to clean my windshield.

Post a New Response

(954819)

view threaded

Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 21:51:26 2012, in response to Re: Ayn Rand Paul Said It Best, posted by Avid Reader on Mon Jul 2 14:49:29 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Thank you for the supportive documentation.

Post a New Response

(954821)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 21:58:14 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jul 2 18:41:19 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
that has nothing to do with the point I was making. I was referring to the irresponsible behavior of a coed spending her nights dropping acid or washing down methaqualudes with Boones Farm Apple Wine and finding out 20 years later that her kidneys or liver are shot. I was not referring to the unknown side effects of a legitimately prescribed drug such as thalidomide - which was a tragedy but was not irresponsible behavior. Your deliberate attempt to create a moral or legal equivalency doesn't work.

Post a New Response

(954827)

view threaded

Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 2 22:25:07 2012, in response to Re: And Rand Paul Said It Best - Still, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 21:49:37 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your opinion of what I say, and entitled to say same as anyone else the owners of this place allow on this board means less than half a warm bucket of spit which you can use to clean your own &^$#ing windshield. Learn some respect. Otherwise STFU and use your expensive gift to Go Away.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 8

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]