Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 5

Next Page >  

(951806)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by CJ on Wed Jun 20 21:54:09 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by Railman718 on Wed Jun 20 21:44:44 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Okay. Watermelons sound nice to talk about. ;)

Post a New Response

(951853)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 01:07:45 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Wed Jun 20 21:03:42 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
A wager over what "issue"? In any case, I'm not foolish enough to make a wager of any kind with you, since you would merely state yourself the winner.

Post a New Response

(951879)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 05:53:15 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jun 20 17:39:18 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There are no secrets on the intarwebs.

And everything you read is true!

Post a New Response

(951882)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 06:11:21 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 01:07:45 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The issue you claim to be the truth. There would be an impartial judge. Cone on, put your money where your mouth is. Or are you not so sure of the truth now? LOL!

Post a New Response

(951884)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 06:21:01 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by Fred G on Wed Jun 20 17:13:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually I may have spilled the beans on that one myself. Or maybe not. It's been so long I can't really remember.

Post a New Response

(951885)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 06:25:25 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jun 20 19:06:14 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
nah...THE POLE DANCING. 8-)


Post a New Response

(951886)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 06:26:13 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jun 20 19:06:14 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
nah...THE POLE DANCING pedophilia one. 8-)


Post a New Response

(951887)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:26:32 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 05:53:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Halle*LOO*jah! :)

Post a New Response

(951889)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:28:35 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 06:25:25 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Whose pole? :)

Post a New Response

(951890)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 06:30:13 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:26:32 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
you're such an anti-semite. 8-)

Post a New Response

(951892)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:35:15 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 06:30:13 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Always willing to do my part to run up other people's psychiatric bills. :)

Post a New Response

(951911)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:10:12 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 06:11:21 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
As the only possible "impartial judge" in any dealings with a slippery, word-humping individual such as yourself would have to be a Civil Court jurist, I feel it would be a bad idea to make a wager of any kind with you. However, the truth of your behavior will reveal itself to all, the next time you actually appear on a fan trip, nostalgia baseball special, or Holiday train. We'll see what happens then.

Post a New Response

(951914)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jun 21 08:19:47 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:10:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You know you just opened yourself up to the "ooohhh you scared" reply but take heart in he says the same thing to me (in not replying to him here) and we all know he has no balls anyway..

The Holiday trip showed everybody that it must s**k being as coward..

Post a New Response

(951920)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 08:37:51 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:10:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nope. You just aren't willing to put your money where your mouth is. Suddenly you aren't so sure that the information you have been given is correct. You're pretty pathetic. You talk big but you can't back it up. The fact that you would say such ridiculous things about people without even being sure that what you are saying is true, says A LOT about your character and also says a lot about your (lack of) journalism skills.

For the record, not only has no one been able to show that I have a pattern of being wrong about matters of fact and logic, but also no one has been willing to accept a bet about the correctness of the lies that they post. That's all the proff you need to know that these people are trolling and nothing more. If it wasn't already 110% obvious, LOL!

Post a New Response

(951923)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jun 21 08:41:02 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jun 21 08:19:47 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bump to the obvious..

Post a New Response

(951927)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 08:51:17 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 06:21:01 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually I may have spilled the beans on that one myself. Or maybe not. It's been so long I can't really remember.

The mail room or the firing from the mail room?

Post a New Response

(951928)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Fred G on Thu Jun 21 08:53:41 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 08:51:17 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They all happened so fast, I couldn't keep track.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(951930)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:57:01 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 08:37:51 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No one is willing to accept a bet with you (including me), because no one finds you trustworthy. think about that.

Post a New Response

(951931)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:00:56 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 08:51:17 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The mail room. The firing was revealed by someone else. It was supposed to be secret. SelkirkTMO, that asshole, spread it around, but someone else probably tipped him off.

Post a New Response

(951932)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:01:59 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by Fred G on Thu Jun 21 08:53:41 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, I did hold that job down for a while. Wasn't a bad run.

Post a New Response

(951934)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jun 21 09:03:32 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:57:01 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No you cant really say that,im sure you got some out here who do..

Post a New Response

(951936)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:08:22 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:00:56 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
We are supposed to believe that you, a Cornell-educated engineer, was fired from a mail room job at Stantec?



Post a New Response

(951937)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:11:10 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 08:57:01 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There's no trust involved! Apparently you don't understand the concept of proff. You also don't understand the concepts of logic and reasonable doubt. And I'm sure there are plenty of people here who could serve as the impartial judge. Again, this is simply an issue of you not being sure about the info (lies) you were told. Since you are already ashamed you sucked up the lies and repeated them, you don't want to endure further misery in the form of a lost bet. You and the people like you are absolutely pathetic. I would be completely willing to make a wager over an issue where I have been repeatedly insisting certain facts to be facts over the protests of others. That's because I have integrity and stand behind what I say. Journalists are also supposed to be like that. But it is clear that you aren't like that.

Post a New Response

(951938)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:13:42 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:08:22 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Huh? Who said that? Your pesky reading comprehension problem acting up again? LOL!

Post a New Response

(951939)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:14:44 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:13:42 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Or rather, not who said that, but where did I say that?

Post a New Response

(951940)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:15:35 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:11:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, your behavior here has shown you to be untrustworthy. Your constant twisting of words and phrases, obfuscation of issues, and, yes, dishonesty, is more than enough to make anyone think twice about making a bet of any amount with you. Continuing to goad me on this will not change my opinion. Can YOU prove that Train Dude is, in fact, lying, especially since he cites the presence of witnesses?

Post a New Response

(951941)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:15:36 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:11:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, your behavior here has shown you to be untrustworthy. Your constant twisting of words and phrases, obfuscation of issues, and, yes, dishonesty, is more than enough to make anyone think twice about making a bet of any amount with you. Continuing to goad me on this will not change my opinion. Can YOU prove that Train Dude is, in fact, lying, especially since he cites the presence of witnesses?

Post a New Response

(951943)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:20:23 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:14:44 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's too hot to pl;ay word-humping games with you today. However, let's start here.

Post a New Response

(951944)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:22:00 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:15:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, see, I've done none of those things, and have repeatedly informed you of this. You are the one who chooses to ignore that and listen to others. That's your choice. But it doesn't make you correct as you think it does.

I think you are completely mixing up several different tall takes told here by morons. Read back up the thread and straighten yourself out and then try to ask me questions that make sense.

Also, try to use your brain and ask yourself tough (for you) questions such as "why is it only the hater types who make these ridiculous claims about supposedly factual cut and dry events? Why don't other railfans ever support the haters' claims?"

Post a New Response

(951945)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:23:11 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:22:00 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Such incredible overcooked horse manure from you this morning...

Post a New Response

(951946)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jun 21 09:24:03 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:20:23 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ah those threads, pawnage and denial to the max there...

Post a New Response

(951947)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:26:54 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:20:23 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Huh? Read what I wrote in response to that post. Why would anything have changed? And lol at you still believing haters over the person himself. How f'ed up is that??? You can't even find posts from reputable people to prove your claims! You're hilarious.

Post a New Response

(951948)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:28:34 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:23:11 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your non-answers tells me that you now know you are completely wrong. Excellent.

Post a New Response

(951952)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 09:54:42 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:28:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
DUNNO....not any pole I would be associated with....fer shere. 8-)

Post a New Response

(951954)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu Jun 21 09:57:18 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jun 21 09:08:22 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh boy......

Post a New Response

(951955)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 09:58:06 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 06:35:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The price of owning stock in CIGNA , huh?. 8-)

Post a New Response

(951956)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu Jun 21 09:59:00 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Jun 21 05:53:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course!!! Its the internet!!

Post a New Response

(951968)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 21 11:09:31 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:26:54 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, that was pretty weak.

Post a New Response

(952105)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 18:32:27 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 21 09:58:06 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pfizer. :)

Post a New Response

(952117)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 18:42:43 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 09:00:56 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. Dumbass ... I was tipped off by a post by YOU right here. Pity you nuked the thread.

Post a New Response

(952175)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:30:35 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 18:42:43 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey shitforbrains, I didn't reveal that I was fired. Someone else did. It was supposed to be a secret. But YOU, the consummate asshole, started spreading it all over the forums.

Post a New Response

(952181)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:42:05 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:30:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. Hey Mister Knowitnot ... YOU posted that you had been fired, I wisecracked on it a few times and that was it. Unlike yourself, I'm not OCD and have no need to spread manure elsewhere. I could give a shit about you and your medical condition.

Kind of a pity that you've made so MANY friends that we'll probably never be able to figure out who actually did all that, and of course with your forcing the evidence to be deleted, you'll never be able to figure out who dunnit either.

That all said, if you want to blame me for it, go right ahead. Rest assured though that it wasn't me and as a result of pointing at me, you'll never know the truth. Heh. I'm loving knowing THAT. :)

Post a New Response

(952188)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:47:17 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:42:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey Claudia Shitforbrains, where is your proff that I had anything to do with anything you are talking about? Why are you posting more lies? Does it make you feel good? Does it soothe your conscious after knowing that you RUINED someone's life????? Asshole.

Post a New Response

(952191)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:49:21 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:47:17 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It makes me feel crescent fresh. LOL

Is somebody butthurt because they're wrong and bitchy? Awwwwww ... poor tard. :)

Post a New Response

(952195)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:54:24 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:49:21 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Has someone been cranky and prone to telling lies for 30 or more years because he was fired by the TA for a fuckup of his own doing? And then because your failed business and financial skills bankrupted you? And then some storm or something destroyed your house? Who's the sad cry baby now?

Post a New Response

(952196)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by Gamera on Thu Jun 21 20:55:31 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:42:05 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
nothing he says is absolute
it all depends on words he includes or leaves out
word humping at its finest
he almost never means what people think he says
expect the unexpected
the obvious is almost always not the answer
he is a twisted mind in a twisted world

Post a New Response

(952197)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:56:33 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 20:54:24 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. You fell right into it as always! :)

Here ... have a cookie.



Post a New Response

(952198)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:59:34 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by Gamera on Thu Jun 21 20:55:31 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I love it ... I used to have to take a trip to the city to watch tards do their thing. Thanks to the miracle of the intarwebs, I don't even have to leave the house! :)

Post a New Response

(952199)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 21:01:33 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 20:56:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
In other words I am correct. Thank you for admitting it.

Post a New Response

(952200)

view threaded

Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 21 21:03:24 2012, in response to Re: AFL-CIO Cutting Re-election Fund Contributions For The President, posted by TERRapin station on Thu Jun 21 21:01:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You're ALWAYS correct. It's what you're all about. You're a lion among girly men.

lol

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 5

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]