|
|
| LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession (942138) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (942139) | |
AlM Obsession is LuchAAA? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:20:47 2012, in response to LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 15:14:36 2012. I guess so.I simply said that an old girlfriend was a missing part of Obama's past. I never said that he was gay. |
|
|
| (942141) | |
Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA? |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Wed May 16 15:27:01 2012, in response to AlM Obsession is LuchAAA?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:20:47 2012. AlM made the LOL a couple years ago something about a cop stopping someone without ID. That was just unreal... and this is the thanks you get. |
|
|
| (942142) | |
Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:28:22 2012, in response to Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA?, posted by cortelyounext on Wed May 16 15:27:01 2012. He's becoming unreadable like bingbong. Time to just stop reading his posts. |
|
|
| (942143) | |
Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 15:29:52 2012, in response to AlM Obsession is LuchAAA?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:20:47 2012. I never said you said he was gay. But you've made numerous posts about why no past girlfriends. |
|
|
| (942145) | |
Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:31:35 2012, in response to Re: AlM Obsession is LuchAAA?, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 15:29:52 2012. Have a nice day. |
|
|
| (942152) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 15:55:59 2012, in response to LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 15:14:36 2012. LOL, he'll leave you alone now. Oh he'll post ABOUT you but won't engage. Nice job :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (942153) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:57:06 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 15:55:59 2012. I never bothered him. I only asked when one of Obama's girlfriend would emerge. |
|
|
| (942154) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 16:00:42 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:57:06 2012. LOL, you sure mention him a lot. He is one of the smartest guys here.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (942155) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 16:01:00 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 15:57:06 2012. You also asked someone recently whether he thought Obama was a virgin when he met Michelle. |
|
|
| (942156) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 16:03:28 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 16:01:00 2012. No. I asked if he was a virgin, would he be mocked like Tebow is for being a virgin. |
|
|
| (942157) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 16:04:55 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 16:03:28 2012. Ah, OK, sorry that I missed the subjunctive mood. :) |
|
|
| (942163) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 16:24:02 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 16:04:55 2012. um I was clear that if Obama lost his virginity in his 20's no one would say shit but Tebow is mocked for it. |
|
|
| (942198) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 18:11:09 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 16:00:42 2012. LOL @ "smartest".I do mention AlM at times. He brought up Obama's college girlfriend. I'm surprised it took this long for one to emerge with details of their relationship. |
|
|
| (942202) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 18:20:55 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 18:11:09 2012. Maybe it wasn't a high priority item. We're all busy working on important projects.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (942208) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 18:28:20 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 18:20:55 2012. Timing is everthing. An election year is a good time to come forward as Obama's college girlfriend and cash in on it. Obama is more a celebrity or pop icon than politician. There's money to be made being his ex-girlfriend. Especially a white ex-girlfriend. |
|
|
| (942251) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed May 16 22:00:10 2012, in response to LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 15:14:36 2012. Not very feminine looking. Or attractive.
|
|
|
| (942256) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 16 22:16:52 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Easy on Wed May 16 22:00:10 2012. iawtp |
|
|
| (942257) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 22:21:57 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Easy on Wed May 16 22:00:10 2012. looks like a woman who maintains a very hairy pussy.imagine the uproar if she was a pretty blonde? |
|
|
| (942306) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu May 17 04:47:05 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Fred G on Wed May 16 15:55:59 2012. PWNT...LOL |
|
|
| (942314) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Thu May 17 07:09:51 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by LuchAAA on Wed May 16 22:21:57 2012. Back in that day most women did. Shaving is new. |
|
|
| (942316) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Thu May 17 07:13:03 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Easy on Wed May 16 22:00:10 2012. Definitely White tho. I believe for Obama, marrying a Black woman was a political necessity. Somehow I doubt he would be President if he had a White wife. |
|
|
| (942322) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu May 17 09:17:39 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by JayMan on Thu May 17 07:09:51 2012. Yep. Look at pics of Playboy Playmates from the 70s and 80s, virtual forests! (I started at the 70s b/c Playboy did not show full frontal until the early 70s, IIRC). Nowadays, usually the only hair you'll see on a Playmate is on her head :( |
|
|
| (942355) | |
Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Thu May 17 11:36:23 2012, in response to Re: LuchAAA, here's the answer to your obsession, posted by Easy on Wed May 16 22:00:10 2012. Who says? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. |
|
|